Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Makwa, post: 852301, member: 27402"] Yes, and he still owns it, as far as I know. He was also Grand Chief for many years. He did not own it until recently though, I don't know who the previous owners responsible for the fraud were. I'm sure the info is out there somewhere. Yes, particularly given that is is likely that Chief Norton also has ties to KGC, through friends or relations. I can't agree here, there may be (probably are) other sites that have found dishonest activity and shut up about it. Prob is most sites are self-regulated, so they can hide problems if they want to (and nobody finds out, as happened with the 2 above). I don't know what the UK criteria are, and also don't know what sites are approved or why, also don't know if this list is just an advisory or is imposed on players in the UK. This would be a great topic for another thread. I also don't know that the statement above is correct or not, though I have no reason to doubt it. My point is that the UK, US or any other state can't stop an international clientele from playing wherever they want to. Again, the incestuous situation between the gaming rooms and KGC is not unusual, most sites are self-governed, and it has nothing to do with the broad and pejorative use of the term 'indian tribe.' 'White paper' is a governmental term yes, often mocked by marginalized peoples who are subject to colonial rule and/or the colonization process, as in the White Paper of 1968 in Canada, which sought to eliminate Native status, abolish all treaties, and forcibly assimilate (exterminate) First Nations people, languages and traditions in this country. Thankfully, it never went further than being a 'white' paper. Sorry you missed the reference, or if you did get it, glad you did. If it's so 'proper,' why the ongoing demand for apologies? Glad to know someone is reading all my posts though, keep it up! Bully, wot! [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us