Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="GrouxLive, post: 3764269, member: 261163"]
I'd say the name "Irrational Madman" would be more fitting. It is completely irrational to think that you understand how, why or when I am most successful in poker. What if I told you, the levels of success in poker, are as varied as the players themselves? OMG!

I won more in a MTT yesterday, than I did three days of live games. And my profit per hour in MTTs is exponentially higher than cash games... I know, I track such data. But go on, tell me about how your way is better for me.

I play really well in tournament play, because it fits my tight-aggressive play style. I think the biggest advantage I have in MTT play, is the fact that other players change their game for the MTT - I don't. I find it much easier to read players who are worried about busting out of an MTT just a few places from the money than it is your normal cash game player.

Exactly. Every player is different, and every player's personality is different. Players who play well in live, might not online, or players who play well in tournaments, might not play well in cash games. To think that there is a wrong or right way to play the game is laughable.

The object is to win the game, how or why you do it doesn't really matter, that's semantics.

Good point, and further proof of the many flawed things brought up in the original post. The math doesn't change, there are still 52 cards in a deck. Now, the variables can change in the game - but the odds are still the same. If you're hoping for that gut straight card on the river, it doesn't matter if there are 2 players in the mix or 9.

:hahaha:
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us