Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="MrPokerVerse, post: 5464531, member: 63658"]
Interesting summation on live and online poker. Every hand for online poker is available to be viewed or ran through programs to look for anomaly. From the perspective of variance, online being different or artificial would show up in queries that have been ran. That is the way they discovered the very few scandals with cheating were uncovered.

When I see a post on luck, and everyone chimes in with a percentage, not one person can substantiate their claim. Everyone agrees or most do any way, that there is an element of luck. Not many want to talk about both sides of the "luck line". What I observe is both sides of the coin, getting luck and then being unlucky. For the most part, it is a trade off. non-factor.

Making the claim of losing to the nuts, hands played after getting cracked and switching sites, that should be something that can be proven and not just stated. RNG not being truly random, wouldn't produce the scenarios you described, even with switching sites. Not being a random phenomenon would suggest repeatability. That would certainly show up on large hand histories.

Did enjoy reading the post, was well written with some interesting correlation. Just doesn't hit home with the amount of time I've played online. With poker leagues, bank roll competition, forum tournaments and some queries ran on my HH.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us