Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="RamdeeBen, post: 1601784, member: 71146"]
22k in cash games actually..

So what you're saying is that the variance isn't more if more people play in a hand? How does that one work?

Evidently your big hand is going to bust much more often than it should if there are more people in the hand...riiiight?...Thats a guess for someone without variance knowledge as you say. Any dummy can work that one out, or not as it seems! :)

So in actual fact, what you're saying is that your win rate over a course of say for example one million hands that the variance will equal out if in a full ring game 9 people play the hand for a million hands rather than say, 2/3 players playing in every hand for 1 million hands? As for a very inexperienced player I say your wrong, it doesn't take much maths to work that the more people involved in a hand means more variance lol...

If I am wrong then please feel free to explain how and why and make me look an idiot, I don't mind so long as I learn from it.

I was only saying the FX who posted his stats that my Aces had lost a lot. Wasn't a whine either and I might not have the experience yourself has at the tables, however if your saying the variance is the same regardless of how many are in a hand then I have to disagree purely based on percentages and the more amount of hands involved means the better hands stand less chance of winning.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us