US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Where would poker be without the "Moneymaker Effect"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Luvepoker, post: 6787745, member: 307971"] I do believe the poker world would be very different if Moneymaker had not won and bubbled. I was interested in poker prior to the boom. I saw the poker sites and saw they becoming mome viable every year. The WSOP was on TV already and growing and the WPT was just about to explode onto television. If Chris would not have won I still believe we would have had a poker boom. It would have been much slower that what we experienced but I believe it would have happened just the same. Chris Moneymaker was in my opinion the perfect storm for pokers growth. A true and pure amateur who played the game for mostly fun " and money" could only dream of the chance to play in this event. $40 he turned into $2.5 Millions.. This is everyone dream wither its poker or something else to take a small amount of cash and win life changing money. IE slots, blackjack or a lottery. Then take the fact he was just like up common folks. Working class. struggling to pay bills in life. He was not flashy person just a good down to earth player who went there for his shot. Add in the name Moneymaker and I believe the perfect storm was set. Then came the bluff of the century against one of the true professional greats of the time he bluffed of not just the winning hand but the championship winning hand. He sat there knowing he was bluffing and held it in until Farha folded. He showed us common fold could play and ever hold our own with them. Yes we in the poker would should be grateful this happened as many may not have tried this game out. His win is why it blew up as fast as it did. If not for this win I think the WPT would have helped poker blow up anyways due to the sponsorship with Party poker. Just those commercials alone would have done it as they were absolutely funny and got players thinking about signing up. Now here is a good question though. Would poker have been better off if Moneymaker had not won? Poker would have grown for sure and much slower but I also would not have been so smack in your face exploding the way it did. We may of never had black Friday are the fight due to S Alderson doing his best to stop legislation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Where would poker be without the "Moneymaker Effect"?
Top