Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="JBGoode, post: 4736879, member: 316441"] I think to accurately answer this question we need statistics that just are not available.... thinks like avg amount of buy ins per tournament, Avg Finish of % of field, ect. it goes beyond winning and losing... We need to focus on who were the players that were best at adapting to the evaluation, and changes in the game? That would be Phil Helmuth hands down. been playing the longest out of all the top bracelet winners, thus based off the information given he would be at the top... but then some would say Jason Bonimo Leading money maker for the past 2 years is the best.... I would say, he is the best as of right now, but can he maintain that as the game changes? If yes, then he is the best, if no then No hes not. [/QUOTE]