Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="N.D., post: 670547, member: 30036"] Me to figure something out. It's part of my "bot-conspiracy theory"/paranoia. Geeze this game can make me paranoid. Anyway, I think it's from an old episode of Poker After Dark, where Gus Hansen won with suited connectors and someone commented on his winning the most hands with suited connectors of anyone. Then he said something like: "Well that's only fair since I play the most suited connectors. I should win..." Anyway, and I've seen it mentioned in articles how there are just more hands played online and faster than in RL, and I'm thinking if u factor in number of questionable to bad hands played it should explain the suckage. So if it makes sense that Gus [i]should[/i] win with more suited connectors based on the sheer number of them he plays(but I watch and he doesn't play them willy-nilly, he's thinking about it), then shouldn't it be equally logical that a chaser should win more chasing hands, just based on how many hands they chase? At the same time, shouldn't they still be losing an awful lot? So much that it should make chasing unprofitable? Anyway, I think it explains the suckage. However, I do think it's something that can be gotten around. I used to think bots, chasers, and fish, were unbluffable. However, and it's generally a guess on my part, they aren't. Just spot a busted draw on the board, and so long as they haven't two pair, and the board's not paired, you can get them to fold. Even if u caught air... But there's more. It's even better if they do have two pair and you're holding much better. They can't fold two pair. They also can't bring themselves to fold a pre-flop pair. I watched a friend beat one with a str8, went through the history and wouldn't ya know it? They couldn't fold 77. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us