US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Is "working for a living" considered gambling?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 2323603, member: 23910"] Sure it's a different form of gambling to lotteries or roulette or slots and sure, there's absolutely a skill element to poker (I wouldn't be on this site or playing poker if I believed otherwise). But that doesn't change the fact that it [b]is[/b] gambling. And the PPA is absolutely barking up the wrong tree trying to "prove" otherwise. Here's why: The kind of people who are against online poker on moral grounds will [b]never, ever[/b] change their minds just because someone argues that, on a technicality, if you're good enough and play for long enough, poker isn't [i]really[/i] gambling. They'll just point to any one of the hundreds of thousands of people who've lost their life savings playing poker and say "well if it's not gambling, how did it destroy this person's life?". It's an argument the PPA can never win, because broke person trumps skilled grinder every single day of the week. It's also a pointless argument to make when trying to convince people whose objections are about things other than poker being gambling: the ones who think it'll cost jobs in the brick and mortar casino sector, for example, don't care whether poker is defined as gambling or not, they just care that the status quo will be upset. The ones who are worried about it being a vessel for money laundering don't care that it's gambling, they just care about whether money is getting laundered or not. If you make "it's not gambling" the central issue then you fail to address any of the legitimate concerns people might have, and you draw attention to the one battle that you simply can't win. Better to dismiss the whole gambling/not gambling issue and focus on the reality: people want to play this game, and if you legalise it, tax it and regulate it everyone is a hell of a lot better off than if you don't. [b]A serious side question on the issue:[/b] We can argue all day over whether a pro with a proven track record of being profitable, like Phil Ivey, is "gambling". But consider Joe Public, who doesn't really know much about the game. Knows the basic rules, but has never read a book, doesn't know much about odds or outs or anything. He goes into a casino on a Friday night after a few drinks and sits down in a poker game. [b]Is Joe Public gambling?[/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Is "working for a living" considered gambling?
Top