US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Is "working for a living" considered gambling?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="rifflemao, post: 2323767, member: 98323"] By the "only tree that matters" comment, I was thinking of the US Government. However, I misrepresented the PPA earlier by implying that the skill-game argument is central to their fight for online poker regulation. Here is an excerpt from their [URL="http://theppa.org/about/mission/"]mission statement[/URL]: "The PPA’s mission is to establish favorable laws that provide poker players with a secure, safe and regulated place to play. Through education and awareness the PPA will keep this game of skill, one of America’s oldest recreational activities, free from egregious government intervention and misguided laws." While they promote (rather than dismiss) the skill game aspect, they are focused on political arguments that are more useful to the fight for regulation: "According to Pappas, the skill game argument is a 'legal' argument, one that affects how poker is treated under current laws. The PPA strives to highlight the differences between poker and other casino games. However, he emphasizes that consumer protection and potential state revenue are the 'political' arguments that are key to having poker licensed in the US. These are the arguments in favor of regulating poker that are being made on Capitol Hill and in state houses across the country." ([URL="http://pokerfuse.com/news/law-and-regulation/ppa-clarifies-poker-skill-game-argument-not-key-to-regulation-27-09/"]source[/URL]) Where the PPA has fought the misconception that "poker can be reduced to gambling" is in the legal realm, by providing experts in the DiCristina case to prove that poker is predominately a game of skill. ([URL="http://calvinayre.com/2013/09/26/poker/dicristina-case-john-pappas-interview-bl-video/"]source[/URL]) Regarding Joe Public, it seems like your side question is rhetorical, but I'll gamble. :) If Joe plays against the odds (calling large bets to chase straight and flush draws etc), he would be considered gambling. If Joe plays a poker tournament and manages to get short-stacked, he would need to gamble or get blinded away. There is a gambling element to poker. What is your point by introducing Joe Public (who we welcome, btw)? :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Is "working for a living" considered gambling?
Top