US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Would you play this poker game that has only one major change from no limit hold'em?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="LukeSilver, post: 6891832, member: 59099"] It is a totally different game at that point. If I have say AhKh on a 7d4h3h board against 9d7c then I am 53% to win in fact against most over pairs or top pair hands I am over 50%. So if villain moves all in and I believe most of his range is top pair or over pair then I should go for the all in clash. (assuming cash or mtt that does not take into account ICM factor) however in your scenario rather then having >50% equity I have roughly 25/26% equity in the pot. I go from been able to call any bet villain makes to only been able to call if I am getting odds of 3-1 or better. all draws are now weakened significantly. Also the famous two over cards vs a pair flips are a thing of the past. previously AK was a good all in hand because you block AA and KK by removing an A and a K making it harder for villain to have AA or KK most likely with AK your either flipping or a strong favourite but now if AK suited gets it against 22 they go from been 49.77% vs 49.6% with 0.63% of a split to outright losing 49.6% of the time splitting 49.77% of the time and taking 25% of the pot 0.63% of the time. lets say for simplicity the all in was 50bb from both players and assume its blind vs blind with no antee then there are 100bb in the pot in the current format hero with AK suited has a chip ev of 49.77%*100=49.77 + 0.63%*100=0.63 so 49.77+0.63=50.4 to 50%*49.77%*100=24.885 +0.63%*0.25*100=0.88 =24.885+0.88=25.765 so basically AK suited goes from been the marginally positive side of a coin toss to been absolutely crushed. The change you propose would massively alter the game. the entire strategy for playing the game would need to be changed this in effect becomes an entirely different format/game. if this became the dominant format then I guess I would have to do intensive study to learn the better way of playing this game but unless that happens it would just be a novelty game I might occasionally play for micro stakes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Would you play this poker game that has only one major change from no limit hold'em?
Top