Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DiegoRamos, post: 5878916, member: 138698"] No, my question is, why didn't he win everything he played? First, as you said yourself, Poker was not popular, meaning there were far fewer players, resulting in less competition. Even so, his victories have a great gap, so there was a great occlusion, perhaps, his addiction and family shakes would have directly impacted his results and maybe he would have been the best in the world, but it was not, in my view. Don't get me wrong, I'm not belittling all of his genius and his progress that little has come and few have come. But someone I think is above him in terms of game consistency is Fedor Holz, what do you think? [/QUOTE]