Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="lilu80, post: 6836127, member: 104023"] [B] For me, bad beat is only when the opponent had very little chance of winning, but only when fate decided in the next stage of the game and in the earlier stage of the game he was the winning player with a huge percentage advantage. [/B] We can't talk about a bad beat after we played all the hands and it turned out that we lost just referring to the fact that we had much better cards before the flop. A lot depends on what the whole game was like and what our games were. Example: Villain in late position has AA. All players match. Hero in BB position is 45o Villain decides to play slowplay. FLOP: A67. Villain again check. TURN: A673 Villain play bet. Hero play massive overbet and allin. Villain call. RIVER: A673K A frequent scenario of incorrect assessment of bad beat. In this case above, Villain looks at his AA starting cards after losing and begins to complain that he had AA after all and was so unlucky here, because he lost with 45o and called it bad beat. Wrong for me. He will even take a picture of all the cards on the table showing his AA and rival 45o and the cards on the table A673K and even showing this picture to his friends won't make it a bad beat. :) In this case, one cannot speak of a bad beat, because the player participated at an earlier stage of the game in the hands and it was also his decision that influenced the fact that he lost and not only fate. He was a loser at an earlier stage because of how he played. Now let's assume the same cards but the players played for everything before the flop. Only fate decides here. In fact, AA cards against 45o have a very significant advantage. AA cards lose with 45o but the player made no other decision. In this case, it's just a bad beat! [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us