0546474
Legend
Bronze Level
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2016
- Total posts
- 2,623
- Awards
- 14
- Poker Chips
- 190
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #26
Not a bad poker room, I like it !!!
I favor Seals with Clubs. It's one of the few Linux friendly rooms, and works especially well with the Opera browser. The main downsides are that SwC makes you gamble twice: once on your cards, and again on the value of Bitcoin as each chip is worth 1E-6 Bitcoin. You need to watch Bitcoin like a hawk, lest Bitcoin takes a dive and wipes out your winnings. Also, you can't upload avatars, and the stock ones suck. Other than that, I like it.A3200304 said:What is your favorite poker room and why?
Loads of them. Don't ask me why fish do stuff like this. I gave up on trying to figure out why fish do the things they do. Otherwise, I'd drive myself nuts.Maxmustdie 2 minutes ago on the bubble i shoved JJ man hit cal with 59
is there an idiot who calls with 59?
Yeah? So? Equilab says:Maxmustdie i just lost preflop AA <9Q in $3.3 tournament and this was my last tournament in this scam room
i have no more strength
Even a lousy "Beer Hand" still has better than 12% equity against Pocket Rockets. Your "rockets" are fated to crash and burn sometimes. SUX when it happens said:That is a good perspective and attitude to have towards an unfortunate and frustrating scenario. It took me a long time to be able to brush hands like that off. That is what you have to do though and keep on grinding.
Sadly I am seriously starting to doubt that on WPN. I have seen way too many one out hands hit on the turn and river there lately to trust the software. I know people are going to say "variance" and the like but it just doesn't seem like variance anymore as often as it happens. Feels like the board is just set up to get more people to bet big to generate rake or so that people can be knocked out of tournaments early so that they don't drag on. I am probably wrong but I see that type of hand so incredibly often even in back, to back, to back hands I simply don't trust it being completely random.Dorugremon said:Let these fish keep playing that way, and you'll get it back, and with interest, sooner or later.
The problem is not what can happen, happens, the problem is who it consistently happens for. The variance isn't true variance if it leans extremely hard in two specific ways. Not even sure you can call it variance at that point. When people come on here and consistently say the exact same thing, can people really continue to say there is nothing to it?Adi8877 said:and i trust in the poker, my knowledge of basic count, knowing variance, possibility numbers, that is not me, even next to these criminal activities what are tolerated, i can be a small winning one.... but come on, what can happen, that happens.... and basically we talk about money... how everywhere in the world, nothing else counts, and humanoids doo everything for it, if they earn,win enough they can get away with anything, without consequences....
Ice Wolf said:The problem is not what can happen, happens, the problem is who it consistently happens for. The variance isn't true variance if it leans extremely hard in two specific ways. Not even sure you can call it variance at that point. When people come on here and consistently say the exact same thing, can people really continue to say there is nothing to it?
That's my experience on ACR as well.karl coakley said:Most ACR games and tournaments are on the softer side. Never had a problem with deposits or withdrawal. It's a good solid poker room that has been around a while.
Maxmustdie said:top4 preflop
why you shouldn't make a deposit to this scam room
you will see this shit every day
a person or a bot who randomly presses buttons wins the tournament
![]()
top4 preflop
why you shouldn't make a deposit to this scam room
you will see this shit every day
a person or a bot who randomly presses buttons wins the tournament
friend, what if I tell you that WPN was not certified for a random number generator, when I threatened them with a court, the certification immediately appeared, and moreover, retroactively, for a long time I do not trust this network for good reason; numerous players call this network scammers. and even certification does not give a guarantee:smile:Ice Wolf said:Sadly I am seriously starting to doubt that on WPN. I have seen way too many one out hands hit on the turn and river there lately to trust the software. I know people are going to say "variance" and the like but it just doesn't seem like variance anymore as often as it happens. Feels like the board is just set up to get more people to bet big to generate rake or so that people can be knocked out of tournaments early so that they don't drag on. I am probably wrong but I see that type of hand so incredibly often even in back, to back, to back hands I simply don't trust it being completely random.
Bambini7777 said:friend, what if I tell you that WPN was not certified for a random number generator, when I threatened them with a court, the certification immediately appeared, and moreover, retroactively, for a long time I do not trust this network for good reason; numerous players call this network scammers. and even certification does not give a guarantee:smile:
lol I don't seem to play there, but I watch you only skate freerolls and according to your statistics, it's not for you to tell me about improving the game!nairolph87 said:yeah dude i am sure that wpn was scared as hell because you threatened them with court. work on your own game and dont blame others is my tip for you right here. if you dont like them, you are welcome to play somewhere else.