the first option with Wallet with specific amount is much better to stop in the right time and avoid losing the whole your bankroll in case you will go over the limit
There is a difference. If you play on a site where there is a Wallet, you can withdraw from it only. If you have a balance somewhere else (Poker, Sportsbook or casino), you would have to transfer it back to your wallet.I don't care where the money is stored, as long as I can withdraw it quickly. If withdrawals are available for both the wallet and the balance, I don't see much difference between the two options.
That's probably better for you if you are a responsible player.I think the easier it is to use the functionality, the better. I prefer it when money is available for all types of games, without any restrictions or additional actions.
I think of the Wallet as the BR from which you take the amount you are willing to play with in a given session.I would stick to balance, even though wallet looks tempting
The money in a wallet is still in your account. The wallet can be considered like a BR though. You take from it what you need for a given session. Poker or casino. When you're done, you bring back what's left or your winnings.As far as I understand, keeping money in your account is a more convenient option.
Nothing wrong with that. It's actually the most common disposition.It's inconvenient, I prefer a united balance.
I think in all poker rooms that I have chosen to play at , they considered all my money as balance and when I switched to casino games I could play with all my poker money balance . There was no protection limit or other rule so ax to be more carefully how much you spend on the casino .
That is so true. Even if it was still in the bank, they would make a deposit and go at itThose who want to spend every last penny will do so regardless of where their money is![]()