KK 3 bet, did I 3 bet the right sizing?

B

Bluelime

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Total posts
26
Awards
1
Poker Chips
24
Casino Coins
0
  • #1
Game
Hold'em
Game Format
No Limit
Stakes
$.01/$.02
Table Format
6-max (6 seats)
VP$IP
69
Currency
$
Got a chart that says raise ''24 bb'', not sure if it means add 24 or raise to 24 . Is there maybe a rule to memorize ?



Kko



Poker Hand #HD2972635070: Hold'em No Limit ($0.01/$0.02) - 2026/07/28 11:54:48
Table 'NLHWhite140' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: 2000494c ($2.07 in chips)
Seat 2: d9e8a140 ($4.17 in chips)
Seat 3: Hero ($2 in chips)
Seat 4: 2af35977 ($5.2 in chips)
Seat 5: a2f17355 ($0.67 in chips)
Seat 6: 2fd82337 ($2 in chips)
2000494c: posts small blind $0.01
d9e8a140: posts big blind $0.02
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to 2000494c
Dealt to d9e8a140
Dealt to Hero [Kd Kh]
Dealt to 2af35977
Dealt to a2f17355
Dealt to 2fd82337
Hero: raises $0.03 to $0.05
2af35977: raises $0.07 to $0.12
a2f17355: folds
2fd82337: folds
2000494c: folds
d9e8a140: calls $0.1
Hero: raises $0.24 to $0.36
2af35977: calls $0.24
d9e8a140: folds
*** FLOP *** [6h 4c 4s]
Hero: bets $0.64
2af35977: folds
Uncalled bet ($0.64) returned to Hero
*** SHOWDOWN ***
Hero collected $0.79 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $0.85 | Rake $0.04 | Jackpot $0.02 | Bingo $0 | Fortune $0 | Tax $0
Board [6h 4c 4s]
Seat 1: 2000494c (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: d9e8a140 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: Hero won ($0.79)
Seat 4: 2af35977 folded on the Flop
Seat 5: a2f17355 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: 2fd82337 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
 
Last edited:
F

fundiver199

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Total posts
16,960
Awards
2
Poker Chips
1,261
Casino Coins
0
  • #2
Preflop
I would advice you to stop using charts, since they are always written for very specific situations. Here the 3-bet was kind of small, but there was also a cold call of the 3-bet from the blinds, which the chart surely does not take into account. You went to 3X or 18BB, which is kind of small, when there are two players in the hand, so I would go a bit bigger here like maybe 4X or 24BB. You are still not crossing the preflop threshold with that kind of sizing, when you are 100 BB deep. If this was a tournament hand, where the effective stack was shorter like 70-80BB, then this would be good sizing, but in a 100BB cash game I think, its to small.

Flop
Now you bet really big leaving less than a half pot sized bet behind, if he give you action. This kind of sizing makes it kind of obvious, you are never folding, and my big question is, why do you want to play this so fast and almost make it a 1-street hand? Its a total contradiction to the sizing, you were using preflop. You have 3 streets to get the money in, so you can bet as little as $0,25 on the flop and put his A high in a tough spot. You have most of his range drawing to 2 or 3 outs here, so there is very little value in forcing him out of the pot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eetenor, Bluelime and Station_Master
B

Bluelime

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Total posts
26
Awards
1
Poker Chips
24
Casino Coins
0
  • #3
fundiver199 said:
Preflop
I would advice you to stop using charts, since they are always written for very specific situations. Here the 3-bet was kind of small, but there was also a cold call of the 3-bet from the blinds, which the chart surely does not take into account. You went to 3X or 18BB, which is kind of small, when there are two players in the hand, so I would go a bit bigger here like maybe 4X or 24BB. You are still not crossing the preflop threshold with that kind of sizing, when you are 100 BB deep. If this was a tournament hand, where the effective stack was shorter like 70-80BB, then this would be good sizing, but in a 100BB cash game I think, its to small.

Flop
Now you bet really big leaving less than a half pot sized bet behind, if he give you action. This kind of sizing makes it kind of obvious, you are never folding, and my big question is, why do you want to play this so fast and almost make it a 1-street hand? Its a total contradiction to the sizing, you were using preflop. You have 3 streets to get the money in, so you can bet as little as $0,25 on the flop and put his A high in a tough spot. You have most of his range drawing to 2 or 3 outs here, so there is very little value in forcing him out of the pot.

Thanks a lot for your answer it was really informative. My reasoning was simply that since it's 2 NL I wanted to shove money into the pot and get paid for it, but sadly he folded. I suppose maybe I should've bet lower.

What do you suppose his range is ? To be quite frank I never know what ranges people have even when I do reviews. What does it mean to have your range drawing to 2 or 3 outs ?
 
aorodrigo

aorodrigo

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
May 22, 2024
Total posts
280
BR
Poker Chips
345
Casino Coins
0
  • #4
I'd have checked on flop, waiting for his action
 
eetenor

eetenor

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Total posts
2,951
Awards
2
Poker Chips
749
Casino Coins
20
  • #5
Bluelime said:
Thanks a lot for your answer it was really informative. My reasoning was simply that since it's 2 NL I wanted to shove money into the pot and get paid for it, but sadly he folded. I suppose maybe I should've bet lower.

What do you suppose his range is ? To be quite frank I never know what ranges people have even when I do reviews. What does it mean to have your range drawing to 2 or 3 outs ?
How to think about ranges-first get GTO Wizard and look at solver charts. It will show you what range is supposed to 3 bet you. then think about your 2nl villains are they 3 betting more or less of that range.
2 out hands are pairs QQ etc they have 2 outs AQ has 3 outs to the A + draw equity.

:unsure::geek:
 
F

fundiver199

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Total posts
16,960
Awards
2
Poker Chips
1,261
Casino Coins
0
  • #6
Bluelime said:
My reasoning was simply that since it's 2 NL I wanted to shove money into the pot and get paid for it, but sadly he folded. I suppose maybe I should've bet lower.
But why then did you not apply the same logic preflop? There are very few hands, that will give action to a 4-bet to 18BB, that will not also give action to a 4-bet to 24BB. So by going small you are leaving money on the table preflop. You dont need to have a balanced 4-betting range at 2NL, Because as you say, people are calling to much, so bluffs are not profitable. Which mean, that if you have a hand like KJs, that might be supposed to 4-bet some percentage og the time, you can just call his small 3-bet and see a flop. And then your entire 4-betting range is for value and probably also happy to stack off especially against the fish, who cold called a 3-bet out of position.

Also nobody are suggesting, you should not go for max value postflop on this board. You absolutely should. But there are 3 streets postflop, so if you bet small, you can get your value on the turn and river. Or maybe a small sizing induce him to ship it in with a hand like AK, because he dont want to fold to a small bet, and he also dont want to call, or he think, it looks weak, so he turn AK into a bluff. There is a reason, why solvers never bet this big in a 4-bet pot, and that reason also apply to a 2NL game.
Bluelime said:
What do you suppose his range is ?
Since he folded, I am pretty sure, he had a hand, that missed, with AK or AQ being the most likely, since he did 3-bet you in the earliest possible position and then also called your 4-bet. But the issue is, that even if he was somehow in there with a hand like A6s or 55, that flopped a weak pair, he can just fold to this flop sizing, since you are representing exactly the kind of hand, you had. If he is a thinking player, even hands as strong as 99-JJ can go straight into the muck, because you basically always have QQ+ for value, when you take this line and sizing, and zero bluffs.
Bluelime said:
What does it mean to have your range drawing to 2 or 3 outs ?
As explained by eetenor hands like AK or AQ are drawing to 3 outs against KK, and hands like 99-QQ are drawing to 2 outs on this kind of board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eetenor
B

Bluelime

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Total posts
26
Awards
1
Poker Chips
24
Casino Coins
0
  • #7
eetenor said:
How to think about ranges-first get GTO Wizard and look at solver charts. It will show you what range is supposed to 3 bet you. then think about your 2nl villains are they 3 betting more or less of that range.
2 out hands are pairs QQ etc they have 2 outs AQ has 3 outs to the A + draw equity.

:unsure::geek:

Yeah I probably should get GTO wizard. I got confused as hell by your replies so I plugged it into GPT and it all makes sense now, now I understand what you all meant.

Basically since he 4 bet his range is narrow, and on the flop I'm ahead of him so I should've bet small to make it so that he keeps calling me with worse hands

Thanks a lot

fundiver199 said:
But why then did you not apply the same logic preflop? There are very few hands, that will give action to a 4-bet to 18BB, that will not also give action to a 4-bet to 24BB. So by going small you are leaving money on the table preflop. You dont need to have a balanced 4-betting range at 2NL, Because as you say, people are calling to much, so bluffs are not profitable. Which mean, that if you have a hand like KJs, that might be supposed to 4-bet some percentage og the time, you can just call his small 3-bet and see a flop. And then your entire 4-betting range is for value and probably also happy to stack off especially against the fish, who cold called a 3-bet out of position.

Also nobody are suggesting, you should not go for max value postflop on this board. You absolutely should. But there are 3 streets postflop, so if you bet small, you can get your value on the turn and river. Or maybe a small sizing induce him to ship it in with a hand like AK, because he dont want to fold to a small bet, and he also dont want to call, or he think, it looks weak, so he turn AK into a bluff. There is a reason, why solvers never bet this big in a 4-bet pot, and that reason also apply to a 2NL game.

Since he folded, I am pretty sure, he had a hand, that missed, with AK or AQ being the most likely, since he did 3-bet you in the earliest possible position and then also called your 4-bet. But the issue is, that even if he was somehow in there with a hand like A6s or 55, that flopped a weak pair, he can just fold to this flop sizing, since you are representing exactly the kind of hand, you had. If he is a thinking player, even hands as strong as 99-JJ can go straight into the muck, because you basically always have QQ+ for value, when you take this line and sizing, and zero bluffs.

As explained by eetenor hands like AK or AQ are drawing to 3 outs against KK, and hands like 99-QQ are drawing to 2 outs on this kind of board.
Mmmh quite honestly because I'm bad at the game and have genuinely 0 knowledge on what the appropriate bet sizes are for every different situation. I usually just simplify to betting 3 times or 4 times when I have very good cards.

Thank you for the thorough explanation, I now see why I should've bet smaller.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fundiver199 and eetenor
Top