Is Bluffing Overrated at Low Stakes?

It's harder to get past, but I wouldn't call out the bluff.

At low limits, people often don't understand the game well, so you need to bluff less and play only with a good card. This is not just my opinion; high-limit players say this.

At micro stakes, bluffing is often overrated because many players like to call too much and are reluctant to fold even weak hands. That is why triple barreling against a calling station is often an expensive mistake rather than a good strategy.
Here, the principle of exploit > balance is more important — instead of balancing ranges, you should adjust to the weaknesses of the player pool. If opponents call too much, it is better to bluff less and value bet more often. If they fold too much, then applying pressure and bluffing becomes more profitable.
Bluffing is still necessary, but only in the right spots: against players who can fold, on suitable boards, and with a logical betting line. At low stakes, most profit usually comes not from fancy bluffs, but from simple and confident value betting.