Would you rather play against nits or maniacs in cash games ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anbu210
  • Start date Start date
I’ll take maniac opponents. Makes the game more dynamic. But ideally what I really want is maniacs to my right and nits to my left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hospedar, hardongear and Marcos1315
Either as long as they are losing players. Hard to make much money from nits buy variance is low. With maniacs variance is high but its generally profitable if in position (assuming they are not just a good LAG)
 
  • Like
Reactions: fundiver199
Nits for me as well, I don't like the randomness when playing with maniacts.
 
A table full of Nits all day every day. Nits over fold so we get to steal pots all day long- then when they have something good AA KK Top Pair best kicker we get to stack them with better and fold worse. Nits play face up if we know how our V play we make the most money from them over time.

🤔🤓
 
  • Like
Reactions: elflake and SpanRmonka
I want maniac arama.....cash games are too dull with the slow grind against nits.....of course if they are also terrible, then I'll take them!! Haha
 
eetenor said:
A table full of Nits all day every day. Nits over fold so we get to steal pots all day long- then when they have something good AA KK Top Pair best kicker we get to stack them with better and fold worse. Nits play face up if we know how our V play we make the most money from them over time.

🤔🤓
Having made my comment then read yours, I think I just need to get better at poker! 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: eetenor
I prefer maniacs. Sure the swings are bigger, but at least they make mistakes. Against nits it feels like watching paint dry and folding for 2 hours.
 
Maniacs are where the easy money comes from and usually pretty quick but you want them on your right. The money off nits comes slower and from mostly smaller pots over time. Doesn't matter to me I'll simply adjust my game for the table and villain in the hand at the time.

Cheers!!!
 
I feel more comfortable playing against nits. It's more predictable.
But it depends more on how well the opponent adapts. If you exploit it and they don't adjust, it could be anyone.
 
I do t like nits , I think they call only when they have a very good hand , so it's hard to get paid when you have the strongest hand . Maniacs on the other hand might play looser , call more hands , take more risks , pay your best hand more often , imo
 
Maniacs, but only with position on them. Station_Master's point about seating is the key variable here - a maniac to your left is a nightmare because they act after you and can blow the pot up once you've already committed, but a maniac to your right basically pays you off every time you wake up with a real hand since you get to see what they do first. Nits are just a low-variance grind; you know their range is always strong so there's no creativity required, you're just waiting them out and stealing blinds. Maniacs at least give you the chance to win a monster pot off one good read, even if the swings are rougher.
 
Most players prefer facing maniacs in cash games because they make more mistakes and are easier to exploit. Nits are predictable and allow more blind steals, but they usually don't pay off big hands. Overall, maniacs offer the greatest long-term profit for disciplined players.
 
Maniacs on my right, and nits on my left. In that way I can play in position against the maniacs, and the nits will only content my opens, if they have a strong hand 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: nabmom
I usually prefer maniacs when I have my nuts and NITs when I have my dumbiest bluffs...

nabmom said:
But ideally what I really want is maniacs to my right and nits to my left.

I make your words mine... (but if they two were in my right it would be great too lol)
 
  • Like
Reactions: nabmom
Weak, passive players make the most expensive mistake in poker: calling too much with bad hands. You can extract chips from them smoothly and without risking your bankroll.Play against them the same way you would against your 7-year-old nephew, whom you just taught to play. By playing more cautiously than usual and allowing them to build up your bankroll, you have the opportunity to make a good profit off your friends—and then have them as friends no more!
 
well.... they make more mistakes and give you more opportunities to win big pots 🙂
 
I’d probably choose maniacs, especially if they’re on my right. The variance is higher, but they make more mistakes and give you more chances to win bigger pots.
 
doesn't matter both are horrible for poker ecosystem
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roobz75
Maniacs seem to be such luckboxes. Variance collects its debt eventually, but seems I am usually not there to see the justice to happen.
 
I’d probably choose maniacs. I like having some action at the table, and if you stay patient, their aggression can work in your favor.
 
Back
Top