Zoom

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrpolyglott
  • Start date Start date
the zoom is wonderful game every time between the intervals of the tournaments
 
Hi! I was playing zoom. but once again not necessary. I did not like. in tournaments more interesting/
 
The zoom is very good the change of opponents the table facilitates depending on the style of your game.
 
I have won a lot and lost a lot in Zoom. I think I am going to avoid playing Zoom for now. The swings are just too much for me and reading players is near impossible (since you keep switching tables).
 
ответ

I think it is reasonable to increase the number of tables in the game and uploaded for example 5 tables and in case if you lose then no longer load.))))))))
 
Zoom MTT's are the best. 🙂
You play more hands than in normal tournament, so the luck is less important.
 
I like Zoom because of the volume of hands. I played 80K at microstakes 6-max Zoom, and lost a fair bit. The rake and variance crushed any chances of winning at it. I switched over to regular speed cash tables and am winning more. I hate how slow the regular tables are, but I would rather be winning, than see more hands.
 
Awrpze said:
I like Zoom because of the volume of hands. I played 80K at microstakes 6-max Zoom, and lost a fair bit. The rake and variance crushed any chances of winning at it. I switched over to regular speed cash tables and am winning more. I hate how slow the regular tables are, but I would rather be winning, than see more hands.
Click to expand...

Multi-tabling combats this.
 
I like zoom tables for good speed. I hate wait more. But I agree with opinions that there are many bad bids here. And I go back to regular ring tables. Regular tables more benefit for me.
 
Hi all! I like zoom table because of the speed but the negative part is that most of the time you only play with at least 1 or two 2 opponents each hand. Also it's difficult to be profitable, you have to mark your opponents and try to look when the fishy hour is.
 
Back
Top