Of course, I choose poker among all, it's the best game where you make a decision every time you see cards in the casino, the other players are playing for you, and you don't know what mood he decided to play today and what his game will be like today
Personally, in my opinion, it's better to play poker than in a casino or place bets, believe me, I've already outplayed as much as possible and decided that there is nothing better than online poker or live poker, the main thing is to find a good poker room for yourself, such as pokerstars and 888 poker, I'm just an example of my personal example of poker rooms, everyone has their own personal example of poker rooms that they like according to their personal criteria, for example, the same inreface poker room, then withdraw funds and, of course, online people at the poker room, and plus, of course, the eternity of poker rooms around the world.
Sports betting and poker give amateurs a chance to beat the bookmaker. The reason is that these games depend on the skill, knowledge, ability and experience of the player. Poker is still controversial as to whether it is a game of skill or just luck. Even though luck plays a big role in the game, winning at poker still requires some skill.
I only play poker, I think that sports betting or casino does not depend at all on the player. It's just luck. Although I may be wrong because I don't play it. But that's what it seems to me. In poker we have much more control over the game, although sometimes you end up needing luck.
I agree with you that casino games and sportsbetting are games of chance par excellence, but poker (cash or tournaments) is not a game of chance and they are not a lottery game, because sometimes we only get the weak hands and yet we may win, or reach the paid seats or the final table, or vice versa we may see that we were lucky without winning or achieving a satisfactory result or even reaching the paid seats.
Hi🙂black and said:
I believe that poker is indisputably one of the advanced games of intelligence and skills, in addition to the necessity of mastering strategies and the power of observation at the table compared to other games.
If I had to rank them, it would be poker>sports betting>casino. But I wouldn't put casinos in the ranking, I would encourage everyone not to go to casinos at all. There are obviously occasional winners, but in the long run, the casino is not only not profitable, but a real trap.
I mostly lean toward poker since I like the mix of skill and luck, but I do enjoy the occasional sports bet, especially during big events like the Super Bowl. I’ve also been trying out some casinos not on Gamestop lately since they usually have fewer restrictions and more varied games. It's been a fun way to switch things up when I’m not feeling like playing cards.
If we're talking about control over the process, then I would definitely choose poker. In sports betting, I can only guess who will win, but I can't control the course of the game due to random events (for example, player injury, disqualification, etc.). As for casinos, I play at casinos not to win, but to have an exciting time.
Casinos are more geared toward entertainment, as the games have a house edge and little chance of long-term profit. Poker, on the other hand, combines luck and skill, allowing disciplined and educated players to achieve consistent results. Sports betting, on the other hand, can be profitable for those who master statistics, bankroll management, and have quality information, but most end up losing due to a lack of discipline.