Y
yukoner222
Rising Star
Bronze Level
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2007
- Total posts
- 10
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #26
why not! if fishing is considered a sport why not poker
Your are right, Definitively poker is a sport and we must consider it this wayyukoner222 said:why not! if fishing is considered a sport why not poker
A sport requires participation by whomever that enjoys it..Therefore, Poker players are athletes..And what you say about talent..If you say that poker does not require TALENT then wow
I do not think playing cards would be a sport,there is really nothing to it except alot of luck and of course the cards.pokerking123 said:there have been people saying that it is as isn't, what do you think?
It's on sports channels but there is no physical part to it
white_lytning said:(According to my definition of a sport)
Absolutely not.
A sport requires participation by athletes, Poker players are not athletes.
A sport requires physical talent. Sitting in a circle for long periods of time does not qualify as physical talent.
Poker is gambling.
I hate when people try to call everything under the sun a sport. Activities do not have to be sports to make them cool. Golf is not a sport but its very cool. Darts is not a sport. Billiards is not a sport. Poker is not a sport. They are all fun activities that require skill, but do not require athleticism. Thats why they are not sports.
This is the example I always use. If the world was having an international athletic competition, and they did not tell anyone what games the people would be competing in, would you send a poker player or a football player to represent your country? A golfer of a basketball player? Sports are played by athletes. Poker players and golfers are in no way athletes.
It doesn't take anything away from poker to not be called a sport. Lets just leave at a card game. There is nothing athletic about playing cards.
yukoner222 said:why not! if fishing is considered a sport why not poker