US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Does Hachem have a point or not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Crystal Blue, post: 1243296, member: 46561"] Let me explain where I am coming from............ Lets look at it from the anti online poker establishments point of view looking in from the outside. To help explain my thought process lets use the following example. ( All hypothetical ) Player one = Married man with 2 children and a mortgage who plays perfect poker. Player two = Married man with 2 children and a mortgage who plays bad poker. Player one has a much better chance of being viewed by the anti establishment as someone who displays responsibility both to the game, and to his family because he plays perfect poker. Player two on the other hand, is the kind of player the anti establishment like to use as an example of irresponsibility due to his poor play. They get excited about player two because it's an excuse for them to imply that he could well be effecting his ability to properly provide for his family due to his poor poker play. He is the sort of player they like to use as ammunition when they claim average Joe is sitting at home in front of his computer frittering away monies playing a game of chance. They can't use that excuse with player one though. He is much more likely to be seen as someone who is displaying his skill and knowledge of the game, and is much less likely to be financially neglecting his family. Thus they have less ammunition to use in their quest against online gambling. Yes of course if everyone played perfect poker then luck/variance would become pivotal ( even I know that ) the only real winners would be the pokersites while the players would just be pushing their money around in circles forever more. My point is that the anti establishment brigade would have far less ammunition to use against online poker if online poker players were all perfect players. They sure would have a big party if all were bad players though. It's all hypothetical anyway as the scenario that all could play perfect poker will never happen. This is just my opinion on what Zach originally said. I hope that explains the way I see it, and it's just an opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Does Hachem have a point or not?
Top