Durrr challenge

Crystal Blue · Feb 24, 2009

Latest

Durrrr - $73.000
Ivey - $503.000

dev_aziz · Feb 24, 2009

yess. Durrrr loser

jokish123 · Feb 24, 2009

this is so intense...Durr is getting his butt whooped..he is possibly on tilt right now

GeoffLacey · Feb 24, 2009

And the durrrr v Ivey isn't part of the challenge... which is kinda the point of this thread...

zzzaacckk · Feb 24, 2009

Cmon Durrr you can do it Bro!

dev_aziz · Feb 24, 2009

Durr Lost 147.000 usd total.

Full Tilt poker game #10825770165: Table Ivey Thunderdome - $500/$1000 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi - 20:22:12 ET - 2009/02/24
Seat 1: Phil Ivey ($526,339)
Seat 2: durrrr ($95,084.50)
Phil Ivey posts the small blind of $500
durrrr posts the big blind of $1,000
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Phil Ivey raises to $3,000
durrrr raises to $9,000
Phil Ivey calls $6,000
*** FLOP *** [6s 9h 5s]
durrrr checks
Phil Ivey bets $14,000
durrrr has 15 seconds left to act
durrrr raises to $60,000
Phil Ivey raises to $106,000
durrrr calls $26,084.50, and is all in
Phil Ivey shows [8s As Kc Tc]
durrrr shows [6c 9c 3h 7h]
Uncalled bet of $19,915.50 returned to Phil Ivey
*** TURN *** [6s 9h 5s] [4s]
*** RIVER *** [6s 9h 5s 4s] [Qs]
Phil Ivey shows a flush, Ace high
durrrr shows a straight, Seven high
Phil Ivey wins the pot ($190,168.50) with a flush, Ace high
durrrr adds $50,000
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $190,169 | Rake $0.50
Board: [6s 9h 5s 4s Qs]
Seat 1: Phil Ivey (small blind) showed [8s As Kc Tc] and won ($190,168.50) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 2: durrrr (big blind) showed [6c 9c 3h 7h] and lost with a straight, Seven high

Crystal Blue · Feb 24, 2009

What durrrr says when Ivey asks him how his propbet with Patrick was going just 5 mins ago...................

Dealer: Hand #10826477690
Phil Ivey: how r u and patrick doing?
Dealer: Phil Ivey posts the small blind of $500
Dealer: durrrr has 5 seconds left to act
durrrr: brb
durrrr: idk close to even
Dealer: durrrr is sitting out
Dealer: durrrr has timed out
Dealer: Hand #10826477690 has been canceled
Dealer: Uncalled bet of $500 returned to Phil Ivey
durrrr: im up a little
Dealer: durrrr has returned

ryodejaneiro · Feb 24, 2009

Crystal Blue said:
What durrrr says when Ivey asks him how his propbet with Patrick was going just 5 mins ago...................

Dealer: Hand #10826477690
Phil Ivey: how r u and patrick doing?
Dealer: Phil Ivey posts the small blind of $500
Dealer: durrrr has 5 seconds left to act
durrrr: brb
durrrr: idk close to even
Dealer: durrrr is sitting out
Dealer: durrrr has timed out
Dealer: Hand #10826477690 has been canceled
Dealer: Uncalled bet of $500 returned to Phil Ivey
durrrr: im up a little
Dealer: durrrr has returned

I just checked FT's durrrr-Antonius page and it says durrrr has won close to $150,000. If only the day comes when I can consider $150K to be "a little"!

Yumboltking · Feb 24, 2009

Just watched about an hour of them both muti-tabling. Ivey spanking him bad in the Thunderdome heads up, Ivey up over $700K and also getting best of him on Gus Hansens $500/$1000 HA table. Hate to say it but despite his past record, he looks like he bit off more than he can chew.

Crystal Blue · Feb 24, 2009

ryodejaneiro said:
I just checked FT's durrrr-Antonius page and it says durrrr has won close to $150,000. If only the day comes when I can consider $150K to be "a little"!

Indeed Ryo, those boys sure are on another planet money wise compared to us baby ants.

Yumboltking said:
Just watched about an hour of them both muti-tabling. Ivey spanking him bad in the Thunderdome heads up, Ivey up over $700K and also getting best of him on Gus Hansens $500/$1000 HA table. Hate to say it but despite his past record, he looks like he bit off more than he can chew.

Well that game at the Thunderdome finished just a while back. Durrrr's finishing position was ......... "sit out" saying gg to Ivey.
Ivey's finishing position was ...... just over $1M saying thx to durrrr.

illphillllllll · Feb 25, 2009

been watching durrrr play antonius ever since i picked up this months bluff magazine. from what i seen durrrr has been owning him. he seems to be making his decisions alot faster than patrick too, which means patrick is the one having to think more. don't think anybody is going to beat this guy online the way the challenge is set up. live i think there are many better, but thats not the challenge.

diamond_06_06 · Feb 25, 2009

A little less than 4K hands into the 50K of the 1st match vs Antonius and durrr is up $150,000.

diamond_06_06 · Feb 25, 2009

islandtime2 said:
If Durr is so good why is this a 4 table at a time online challenge and not live around a table? I understand onliner's multi-table to generate more action and more money at a given level in a shorter amount of time but there is no level above what these guys play and they can set the limits as high as they want for a single session so what is the purpose of 4 tabling here ? Is it because Durr respects the live gamers like Helmuth's, Antonius,etc, abilities at single hands/ single session analysis more then his own and thinks they will play worse distracted by three other tables and he needs that edge thinking he can play more bot like then they can ? Just wondering...rip it apart...

Because durrr believes that playing 4 tables gives him an edge over the other players, because he is laying 3 to 1 odds and because it is durrr's challenge to issue anyhow he wants. If someone wants the 3 to 1 odds then they need to accept the conditions of the chalenge.

So this is not about durrr saying that he is the best live player or about him wanting to play a single table at the highest possible stakes imaginable. It is him believing he has an edge playing 4 tables of HU poker online against the best players in the world.

diamond_06_06 · Feb 25, 2009

Sysvr4 said:
Not that he's the definitive odds maker, but Mike Matusow recently went on record as saying Tom had "lost [his] f*cking mind" making this bet and that his ego would eventually break him. I tend to agree.

What made it interesting is that he also mentioned that Tom is one of the most talented poker players he ever knew and that he very much liked him, so it was saying it to be spiteful. He just truly believed Tom was in for a world of hurt.

Tom's skill is undoubtedly great, but his ego has led him to a bet he cannot win. Oh, he may win a match or two, but long term against the likes of Ivey and PA, there's no chance he has a 3-1 edge even four tabling. I find it astonishing that so many are naive enough to believe otherwise... I belive it clearly shows the degree of idolization to which his fans are subject.

Then again, WTHDIK.

He does not need a 3-1 edge, this isn't about Dwan being 3 times better than everyone else. All that needs to happen for him to be successful in the challenge is to be up by $1 or more after playing 50,000 hands of poker at a minimum level of $200/$400.

So once again just because he is laying 3-1 odds he does not need a 3-1 edge, as quite a small edge over 50,000 hands will suffice.

Skidmark · Feb 25, 2009

durrrr dropped over $900K to Ivy. That's gotta hurt the bankroll.

Btw it looks like ftp finally fixed the bugs in their status page including the hand scale on their graph, and they added a decent hand replayer too.

dev_aziz · Feb 26, 2009

Durrrr is 500.000 usd lost.

greenokom · Feb 26, 2009

I wonder how rich are they?

all the poker players like Phil Ivey, David Benyamine, Patrick Antonius, Tom Dwan and etc?
I saw durrrr playing in cash table in ftp and loose in one day almost 700,000$!!

razzmachine · Feb 27, 2009

Durr is back

Love Durr, you gotta give action to get it. Loved the article in Bluff also.

BlackJack · Feb 28, 2009

Honestly what hours do they play because I never see them. One thing i dont get is on the FT stats page, durrrr has won more than Antonius has lost. I don't really see how that happens unless rake is calculated into the winnings.

BelgoSuisse · Feb 28, 2009

BlackJack said:
Honestly what hours do they play because I never see them. One thing i dont get is on the FT stats page, durrrr has won more than Antonius has lost. I don't really see how that happens unless rake is calculated into the winnings.

of course rake is included in the winnings / losses they display.

switch0723 · Feb 28, 2009

noone cares about durr anymore, fullflush all teh way now

Melkor · Feb 28, 2009

switch0723 said:
noone cares about durr anymore, fullflush all teh way now

Is it proven that guy is Luke Schwartz? His chat is pretty tilting though he seems to be crushing.

crazyfool · Mar 2, 2009

It seems like a pretty damn risky bet even tho he has millions. Durrr has been losing quite a bit recently and with his 1.5 to anyones .5M its gonna be tough for him to come out on top. Highstakesdb shows him up a little over 100k vs Antonius after 4.1k hands or so, but he can lose that in a hand or two. Could get exciting at the end.

Skidmark · Mar 3, 2009

Melkor said:
Is it proven that guy is Luke Schwartz? His chat is pretty tilting though he seems to be crushing.

yes he is Luke Schwartz. In his facebook profile he wrote something like "FullFlush unstopable".
But his chat is banned lately so most of the fun is gone

Skidmark · Mar 12, 2009

i guess the challange might be over. They havent played a hand last few weeks and as the wsop starting soon it will be much more difficult for them to make a good schecdule to finish the challange

Durrr challenge

Crystal Blue

Legend

dev_aziz

Rising Star

jokish123

Legend

GeoffLacey

Visionary

zzzaacckk

Rock Star

dev_aziz

Rising Star

Crystal Blue

Legend

ryodejaneiro

Rock Star

Yumboltking

Rock Star

Crystal Blue

Legend

illphillllllll

Rock Star

diamond_06_06

Rock Star

diamond_06_06

Rock Star

diamond_06_06

Rock Star

Skidmark

Rock Star

dev_aziz

Rising Star

greenokom

Enthusiast

razzmachine

Rising Star

BlackJack

Enthusiast

BelgoSuisse

Legend

switch0723

Cardschat Elite

Melkor

Rock Star

crazyfool

Enthusiast

Skidmark

Rock Star

Skidmark

Rock Star

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site