full ring or 6 max?

full ring or 6 max

  • full ring

    Votes: 10 38.5%
  • 6 max

    Votes: 12 46.2%
  • dont matter

    Votes: 4 15.4%
  • neither I dont play cash games

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    26
stormswa

stormswa

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Total posts
3,545
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #1
Full ring or 6-max, was talking to my friend online through IM last week who plays only full ring and I have only played 6 max for last year or so and was wondering what you guys play and why.

I want to know reasons you play only 6 max or reasons you play only full ring.
 
bubbasbestbabe

bubbasbestbabe

Suckout Queen
Silver Level
Joined
May 22, 2005
Total posts
10,675
Awards
1
Poker Chips
68
Casino Coins
0
  • #2
Short handed is my game. Action is faster. Bets for some reason play higher.
 
blankoblanco

blankoblanco

plays poker on hard mode
Silver Level
Joined
May 16, 2006
Total posts
6,129
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #3
if your best asset towards winning is your patience and taking advantage of donks who will stack off light i think full ring is a good choice

if your best asset towards winning is making better decisions than your opponents.. essentially reading and just playing better, 6max is likely more profitable for you because you should rightly be involved in more hands and thus have more opportunity to execute that edge

overall full ring is probably "easier" to play profitably (patience, patience, patience), but 6 max has a greater earnings potential the better you are
 
stormswa

stormswa

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Total posts
3,545
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #4
BBB I think latley I have been playing way too passive postflop, do you think full ring would better suite me till I can become more aggressive? or is this just a hole that is going to be exploited no matter where I play?

im fine preflop, my PFR is always right around my VP$IP but seems like I get scared when I see the flop and just go into calling station mode and usually let people catch.
 
B

bw07507

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Total posts
2,219
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #5
Personally, I have had better results at full ring, playing TAG and LAG. For some reason, at 6max I really try to LAG it up and get crazy to the point where I am a maniac. I just cant seem to control myself with the action moving so fast. Also, I think the competition is a little bit better at the 6max tables.
 
Tammy

Tammy

I'm Here to Help
Administrator
Joined
May 18, 2005
Total posts
64,835
Awards
14
US
Poker Chips
2,592
Casino Coins
75
  • #6
stormswa said:
BBB I think latley I have been playing way too passive postflop, do you think full ring would better suite me till I can become more aggressive? or is this just a hole that is going to be exploited no matter where I play?

im fine preflop, my PFR is always right around my VP$IP but seems like I get scared when I see the flop and just go into calling station mode and usually let people catch.
I think that is a hole that will be exploited regardless, Brian, but more so in 6-max, due to the aggression factor.

I play 6-max for a couple reasons:

1) I don't have tons of time to play, so the games go a little faster.

2) It appeals to my somewhat LAGgy style. I can play more hands and see more action. Me likey. I can more readily play the players versus the cards as well.
 
stormswa

stormswa

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Total posts
3,545
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #7
great im screwed!!!! lol
ok back to filling holes.


juiceeQ said:
I think that is a hole that will be exploited regardless, Brian, but more so in 6-max, due to the aggression factor.

I play 6-max for a couple reasons:

1) I don't have tons of time to play, so the games go a little faster.

2) It appeals to my somewhat LAGgy style. I can play more hands and see more action. Me likey. I can more readily play the players versus the cards as well.
 
bubbasbestbabe

bubbasbestbabe

Suckout Queen
Silver Level
Joined
May 22, 2005
Total posts
10,675
Awards
1
Poker Chips
68
Casino Coins
0
  • #8
6 handed is mostly LAG players. If you are playing passive PF you might actually do good here. At the lower limit tables it doesn't matter what you have PF. Because of the LAG play there you get all sorts of play. It's your play afterwards that matters.

Also if you are trying to play passive as your choice I would move to the short handed PLHE tables. This is the spot where you could really shine.
 
stormswa

stormswa

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Total posts
3,545
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #9
bubbasbestbabe said:
6 handed is mostly LAG players. If you are playing passive PF you might actually do good here. At the lower limit tables it doesn't matter what you have PF. Because of the LAG play there you get all sorts of play. It's your play afterwards that matters.

Also if you are trying to play passive as your choice I would move to the short handed PLHE tables. This is the spot where you could really shine.


yea trust me its not by choice! :eek:

im just a wimp.
 
arkadiy

arkadiy

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 28, 2007
Total posts
2,378
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #10
6-max for sure!
 
stormswa

stormswa

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Total posts
3,545
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #11
stormswa said:
Full ring or 6-max, was talking to my friend online through IM last week who plays only full ring and I have only played 6 max for last year or so and was wondering what you guys play and why.

I want to know reasons you play only 6 max or reasons you play only full ring.

arkadiy said:
6-max for sure!


bold
 
jaymfc

jaymfc

R.I.P DJ & Buck
Loyaler
Joined
May 3, 2007
Total posts
17,374
Awards
100
Poker Chips
768
Casino Coins
150
  • #12
I like the full table , not really sure why , I dont have different way of playing , I just think more people, more money in pot , then if I get a hand they wont all fold.

6 max is ok but I hate when it gets down to 3 or 4 .
 
arkadiy

arkadiy

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
May 28, 2007
Total posts
2,378
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #13
stormswa said:


What if I can't answer the bold besides I always do better and just like the style of play more (as in faster paced, but then I guess this is answering the bold lol)?
 
Chevren

Chevren

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 7, 2007
Total posts
208
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #14
I like full tables more because generally I set aside long periods of time to play and can wait for the right moment and like said above alot of the people that play 6 handed arent there for long and I seem to have to hop around tables more and it takes a while to get good reads on players since I dont use a poker tracker.
 
Kerope

Kerope

Rising Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Total posts
24
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #15
Not sure exactly why, I do decent at full ring, but always get killed at 6 max.
 
S

Seneku

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Total posts
173
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #16
Full ring for me. Don't mind waiting a while to catch some cards knowing some donk will stack you when you hit. Also suits my TAG play better.
 
bubbasbestbabe

bubbasbestbabe

Suckout Queen
Silver Level
Joined
May 22, 2005
Total posts
10,675
Awards
1
Poker Chips
68
Casino Coins
0
  • #17
stormswa said:
yea trust me its not by choice! :eek:

im just a wimp.

Then maybe it's time to shake your game up. Go to the pot limit games. These are great to play at when you are changing your style of play. You can limit your loses there but still make a killing with good hands. Play hands that you normally wouldn't and bet them out. Go to the tables that have the one monster stack and watch how they play.
 
I

i win sometimes

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Total posts
24
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #18
6 handed is the name of the game, you dont have to worry as much in early position with a KQ so you can be the raiser and theres just not as much competition.
 
vanquish

vanquish

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Total posts
12,000
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #19
Shorthanded because it lets me play the players more and the cards less. (most of the time, someone does not have a monster)
 
Egon Towst

Egon Towst

Cardschat Elite
Bronze Level
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Total posts
6,794
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #20
jaymfc said:
6 max is ok but I hate when it gets down to 3 or 4 .

Me too. I always play 6-max these days. I agree with Combuboom that there is more money to be made there if you have an edge over the opposition.

I drop out and find a new table if it falls below 5 players, though. On a table that is very short-handed, everyone plays very loose in order to beat the blinds, and it becomes much tougher to put the opponent on a hand.
 
vanquish

vanquish

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Total posts
12,000
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #21
Actually, to be honest, my new favorite game is heads-up. That's why I wanted to start that heads-up tournament in special events section.
 
B

broncos53

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Total posts
359
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #22
advangtages to both a full rign you can play less agressive and wait for hand and 6 handed you can play more agressive and cant wait as long for a hand....i dont have a favorite it depends on the mood im in that day and the way i want to play....
 
S

smity46

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Total posts
6
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #23
im no good at ring games of any size but play very well at small stake tourneys and sit and gos
 
S

smity46

Rising Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Total posts
6
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #24
i sometimes feel like some of the other players are in collusion in a regular ring game call me paranoid but thats the way it feels
 
M

muddawgg

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Total posts
195
Poker Chips
0
Casino Coins
0
  • #25
i like a full table. the blinds do not get to you as fast..sit back and wait for good hands to play
 
Top