Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
It takes lots of trial & error & also finding ways to have passive income generated. Many attributes that make a professional poker player aren't the glamourous ones. You need discipline, great bankroll management, focus, mental work on not tilting & of course to surround yourself with great people who have similar goals and motivations as you. Initial difficulties were finding ways to improve to the next level. This is not easy & hard to be honest with your own game at times. Being stubborn is not something to be in poker! I am happy to share more, come hang on my twitch channel anytime! JeffGrossPoker.tvbioman420 said:
Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
ah yes the non premiums 🙂 J9ss always a special one, j4ss was my original one when I first started playing poker, just seemed to do lot damage w/ it and made uncanny amount of full houses!HeyMan said:
Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
meditate, think about positive things and happenings in my life! We are lucky to be alive, to have access to computers/learning. Family, friends. Think of areas of your live where you are running way above variance/expectations! This helps for me.Trestivo said:
Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
hello! I can't speak much on that area, there is a lot of great free content. Watching Twitch/youtube videos would be good. Raise Your Edge has a lot of great content. I have a section on my website w/ this; jeffgrosspoker.com/ryepundim said:
Hope this helps!
Jeff
Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
Hey there, I got a new vlog camera, not sure the specs I can ask Vedran (or come on my twitch stream i'll have for you). Live hands i have permission/pass at the venues yes. I don't use hidden cameras & would recommend that as not a good idea for many reasons. I wish you the best & hope that helps.hubcio96 said:
Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
play the math! Do not be results oriented. If you are always putting your money in w/ the best of it then you will only be able to have bad beats and not give bad beats. This is a good thing and you should be happy on this! The math works out over time! glglel_soma77 said:
Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
This is what I started w/ when I first really got into poker! You have to remember tournaments are a completely different skill set. In cash games the stacks are usually the same parameter and often deep. In tournaments you have 10-30bb stacks so often and need to know a lot of push/fold and call charts. Start w/ that!YogSothoth said:
Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
I like soccer. Lot of skill, def some luck! that is why it is a great game. chess is a lot of fun but the better player will win almost always. Poker is nice to have some element of luck!davidkimtai89 said:
No i mean i still have a TIny bankroll after a year playing, i cant afford to go up..is this normal?? After a year of playing one win and couple finaltables and many ITM? Are these results of mine good bad or average for a year of playing? Im sorry for my english im no native speaker.Jeff Gross said:
3-bet question.
Hello, Jeff, don't throw tomatoes at me, please. There was a question-there is no solution...
I pay attention to the fact that when they put 3-bet on the size, they go crazy, as they want... but, as it seems, there is a standard.
3-3. 5 x c positions, 4x c blainds ...
With blainds it is clear, we want to get more folequity, because our implementation will be worse
Interested in playing with buttons and CO against the early ones in 6-max, why no one uses the size of 2.5 x, here are the thoughts:
1) We will compensate for the lower foldequity by implementing our equity post-flop, taking into account our position
Here is the main question, maybe it's just not compensated, or there is some easy adjustment to this size...
2) The possibility of expanding 3beta (for two sizes with a balance)
3) The ability to play from a position in a wider spectrum also in 4-bet, in case the opponents start to expand the 4-bet for us, and they should
I understand that with the top of our range, we want to make the size wider, to implement the hand in a more overclocked bank... to do this, we can make a separate size, let's say 3.7 x against the early ones, where we balance the hands of the 3 percent spectrum of the top with the lowest, which presumably without this we will play in the negative.... And you can do it without it) Use 2.5 for the entire range
I've never used 2.5 x... but the scary thing is, I don't have an understanding of why not to use and why I use 3.5 x
Hello, Jeff, don't throw tomatoes at me, please. There was a question-there is no solution...
I pay attention to the fact that when they put 3-bet on the size, they go crazy, as they want... but, as it seems, there is a standard.
3-3. 5 x c positions, 4x c blainds ...
With blainds it is clear, we want to get more folequity, because our implementation will be worse
Interested in playing with buttons and CO against the early ones in 6-max, why no one uses the size of 2.5 x, here are the thoughts:
1) We will compensate for the lower foldequity by implementing our equity post-flop, taking into account our position
Here is the main question, maybe it's just not compensated, or there is some easy adjustment to this size...
2) The possibility of expanding 3beta (for two sizes with a balance)
3) The ability to play from a position in a wider spectrum also in 4-bet, in case the opponents start to expand the 4-bet for us, and they should
I understand that with the top of our range, we want to make the size wider, to implement the hand in a more overclocked bank... to do this, we can make a separate size, let's say 3.7 x against the early ones, where we balance the hands of the 3 percent spectrum of the top with the lowest, which presumably without this we will play in the negative.... And you can do it without it) Use 2.5 for the entire range
I've never used 2.5 x... but the scary thing is, I don't have an understanding of why not to use and why I use 3.5 x
Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
Hello and great question! Generally you will want to be more aggressive here as others will respect ICM and not take a lot of risk when not opening pots or wanting to call off. It is also worth noting that generally on the bubbles of Final Tables it is short handed; 4 & 5 handed so the hand ranges change significantly and you need to open it up some or get blinded down!spectralwave said:
Jeff Gross
CardsChat Pro/Twitch Partnered Streamer
Silver Level
good question! there is a lot of good info out there, I recommend RYE personally but lot of free content on youtube & Twitch. On my website on the coaching tab I break this down more clearly!emeslaw said:
hi Jeff,
I know these questions are a bit complex but if you can explain the basics of how to play the turn and the same for the river it would be much appreciated.
Im just looking for a general guideline for cash games. thanks
I know these questions are a bit complex but if you can explain the basics of how to play the turn and the same for the river it would be much appreciated.
Im just looking for a general guideline for cash games. thanks