****July Poker Chat Thread****

[Pokertron3000]

Well its silly but all us non loyals know is that people who where loyal have left so we wonder why? Dont get me wrong Im not leaving anytime soon but its natural to question why all this is happening esp with the we will make a comment soon that doesnt happen.

These peeps left for a reason and it yeah you can say trust the mods but who says the mods where right/wrong in the first place? Sorry for negitive thoughts CC will never die but tell me not to question stuff and it makes me question it more.

Btw hope Pantin Belgo and switch stay as they have posted after this mess.

 

[Tammy]

For anyone interested:

https://www.cardschat.com/forum/sug...ouncements-6/announcement-157340/#post1250527

 

[Jagsti]

Surely it's only spam, if the recipient doesn't necesarily want to recieve it?

 

[CCAdmin]

Come on Jag, spam is spam, if you try to advertise one forum on another forum it is quite obvious that it is pure spam.

 

[switch0723]

Btw hope Pantin Belgo and switch stay as they have posted after this mess.

 

[blankoblanco]

no warning at all? seriously?

i think it's pretty obviously different from typical spamming since he sent it specifically to people he is friends with who he figured would have legitimate interest in the site. even if it is an offense, it's an incredibly minor one

does everything really have to be black or white? wow, use your common sense and judge on a case by case basis. this whole "zero tolerance" intransigence is just maddening

i understand why zach was banned and based on everything i've read, didn't really object to that. but this is absolutely ridiculous and stinks of bitterness. you're letting stubbornness hurt the site's content and by virtue of that you're hurting your loyal members. be reasonable

 

[Pokertron3000]

Come on Jag, spam is spam, if you try to advertise one forum on another forum it is quite obvious that it is pure spam.

Ok Nick I saw that link and I will be honest I was intrested but I didnt click on it at all.

I love this site but find it funny how fast something was posted on BW spamming when so many members have been confused on recent events and hear nothing?

We put our trust in cardschat but cardschat sometimes should do the same.

Please stay others you help make this site what it is

 

[Jagsti]

no warning at all? seriously?

i think it's pretty obviously different from spamming since he sent it specifically to people he is friends with who he figured would have some interest in the site. so even if it is an offense, it's an incredibly minor one

does everything really have to be black or white? wow, use your common sense and judge on a case by case basis. the no tolerance intransigence is just maddening

i understand why zach was banned and based on everything i've read, didn't really object to that. but this absolutely ridiculous and stinks of bitterness. you guys are letting stubbornness hurt the site's content and by virtue of that you're hurting your loyal members

Ditto everything Blanko says here!

 

[CCAdmin]

They most certainly should stay, Cardschat is as great as ever - and we are rocking and rolling as always.

Come on guys, Zach went a little crazy, got banned. We did what we had to do, Zach had his own reasons for going crazy. It is what it is, can we move on.

 

[Dorkus Malorkus]

Perhaps you should direct your indignation at the person who underhandedly advertised another forum via PMs while clearly being aware of the forum rules, rather than at those who police the site and do their best to tidy the forum up and rid it of such people?

Warnings do no good when people are fully aware to start with that they're breaking the rules.

Mr McC, drop me (or any mod) a PM with whatever you're concerned about (I can probably guess what), and I'll try to clear things up for you. Same goes for anyone else.

 

[GeoffLacey]

Lol this is ridiculous. Good that we're getting both sides of the story

 

[pantin007]

no warning at all? seriously?

i think it's pretty obviously different from typical spamming since he sent it specifically to people he is friends with who he figured would have legitimate interest in the site. even if it is an offense, it's an incredibly minor one

does everything really have to be black or white? wow, use your common sense and judge on a case by case basis. this whole "zero tolerance" intransigence is just maddening

i understand why zach was banned and based on everything i've read, didn't really object to that. but this is absolutely ridiculous and stinks of bitterness. you're letting stubbornness hurt the site's content and by virtue of that you're hurting your loyal members. be reasonable

couldnt have said it better tbh

 

[CCAdmin]

Blanko,

I have run this forum for 5 years, and I can never see an instance where deliberately advertising/spamming another forum on here would not be an insta-perma ban.

Obviously by virtue that we received complaints about it, it was pure spam.

 

[kidkvno1]

Come on Jag, spam is spam, if you try to advertise one forum on another forum it is quite obvious that it is pure spam.

:dito: I am with the staff, on what has happened, over the last week.
BW doing this, he was acting like a child.

THE rules, are the same for every one.

 

[CCAdmin]

Guys can we take any further discussion to https://www.cardschat.com/forum/suggestions-questions-announcements-6/announcement-157340/ please.

Honestly I can't imagine how you can not see in both cases why we have done what we have done, but if you want me to respond further I am happy to do so - that thread is the place for it.

 

[Debi]

To be clear guys - he mass spammed it. It was not just sent to a few close friends here in this thread. It was forwarded to us by many members - some whom barely know him.

 

[switch0723]

This probably sounds harsh to some guys, but i think this isn't the thread to discuss this in, should prob do it in loyaller

 

[Tammy]

This probably sounds harsh to some guys, but i think this isn't the thread to discuss this in, should prob do it in loyaller

Not everyone he sent it to was a loyaler:

Guys can we take any further discussion to https://www.cardschat.com/forum/suggestions-questions-announcements-6/announcement-157340/ please.

Honestly I can't imagine how you can not see in both cases why we have done what we have done, but if you want me to respond further I am happy to do so - that thread is the place for it.

 

[Snowmobiler]

This probably sounds harsh to some guys, but i think this isn't the thread to discuss this in, should prob do it in loyaller

I hope you keep this where all can see.

I think it can be a good learning experiance for some of us newer members



Snow

 

[Emperor IX]

I have undoomswitched myself. Made silverstar and also won back the exact amount I lost earlier

 

[kidkvno1]

I have undoomswitched myself. Made silverstar and also won back the exact amount I lost earlier

yeah, congrats...
lets hope it gos well for me :smile:

 

[icemonkey9]

Moved ...

 

[Deltafrost]

WEEEEEEEEEEEE, notice expert use of the minraise

--------------------
HAND #1
--------------------

Poker Stars, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker

MP: $25 (100 bb)
CO: $33.75 (135 bb)
Hero (BTN): $56.40 (225.6 bb)
SB: $51.60 (206.4 bb)
BB: $25 (100 bb)
UTG: $21.10 (84.4 bb)

Pre-Flop: Hero is BTN with A

9

UTG calls $0.25, MP folds, CO calls $0.25, Hero raises to $1.25, SB calls $1.15, BB folds, UTG calls $1, CO calls $1

Flop: ($5.25) 6

J

T

(4 players)
SB checks, UTG bets $0.75, CO calls $0.75, Hero calls $0.75, SB raises to $4.75, UTG folds, CO folds, Hero raises to $8.75, SB raises to $20.50, Hero raises to $55.15 and is all-in, SB calls $29.85 and is all-in

Turn: ($107.45) T

(2 players, 2 are all-in)
River: ($107.45) K

(2 players, 2 are all-in)

Results: $107.45 pot ($3 rake)
SB showed K

Q

(a flush, King high) and lost (-$51.60 net)
Hero showed A

9

(a flush, Ace high) and won $104.45 ($52.85 net)

 

[blankoblanco]

haha, pretty sick that you had both of his straight flush outs, nh

 

[Deltafrost]

haha, pretty sick that you had both of his straight flush outs, nh

i thought so. i was kinda sick when i saw board pair tho.

next hand he did this at another table

--------------------
HAND #1
--------------------

Poker Stars, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker

BTN: $95.40 (381.6 bb)
SB: $26.30 (105.2 bb)
Hero (BB): $25 (100 bb)
UTG: $41.15 (164.6 bb)
MP: $29.25 (117 bb)
CO: $25 (100 bb)

Pre-Flop: Hero is BB with A

Q

3 folds, BTN raises to $1.25, SB folds, Hero raises to $4.25, BTN raises to $95.40 and is all-in, Hero calls $20.75 and is all-in

Flop: ($50.10) A

T

2

(2 players, 2 are all-in)
Turn: ($50.10) T

(2 players, 2 are all-in)
River: ($50.10) 4

(2 players, 2 are all-in)

Results: $50.10 pot ($2.50 rake)
Hero showed A

Q

(two pairs, Aces and Tens) and won $47.60 ($22.60 net)
BTN mucked 3

4

(two pairs, Tens and Fours) and lost (-$25 net)