limit tournys vs n-limit wins

Does anyone here agree with me that limit tournaments are easier to win than no limit????

cant say that i've played more than like 5 limit tourneys
the first one i played was a freeroll on absolute poker and i placed like top 10...beginners luck; i bet i couldnt do that now
i guess it's easier not to bust (no easy bust w/ a bad all in call)
but its also alot harder to bluff. Thats where my limit play sucks...i'm used to NL and can't stand not bluffing with a big bet or all in
so i dunno i guess it depends on the kind of player you are...some prefer L to NL

I like to play limit and agree with you it is way easier to place. sometimes you gotta bluf to the river re-raise the river and if you get re-raised call. lmao most likely you'll lose but limit is not really a bluffing game when you are playing idiots and/or idiots.

holduplaya said:

when you are playing idiots and/or idiots.

Click to expand...

Hahah...classic.

But even not playing idiots, there's less bluffing in limit I would think because you often can't bet enough to force your opponent out of the pot. (I'm new to limit, so I don't claim to be an expert)