I think it's a very good way to describe poker. You rarely have complete information, so you have to make decisions based on probabilities, patterns and the information available to you. What makes poker interesting is that eventually the hand has to be completed and the uncertainty disappears. In a way, that's also what makes poker different from many decisions in real life. In poker, you eventually find out whether your decision worked or not, even though the result doesn't necessarily tell you whether the decision itself was good. That's why I think focusing on the quality of the decision, rather than only the outcome, is so important.