My Quest of $0-$10,000 6/08 to 3/09 Completed

  • Thread starter Thread starter bfw0082
  • Start date Start date
Sounds a little iffy to me but good for u, ""dominate poker", what ever.
good luck and see u on the felts.
 
bfw0082 said:
Browse the Freeroll army forum, I have win coloumns there from 2006
Click to expand...

This spelling implies you are British, or trying to be. Please don't.

bfw0082 said:
I have deposited, I used to deposit when I could with Neteller, since then I do not deposit, I have a gambling problem and as long as real money isnt used on Gambling I believe I have control over my addicition...
Click to expand...

Bet $5 you havn't

bfw0082 said:
Believe it or not, I posted this to show I wasnt a penny player as indicated on my stats on Fulltilt poker
Click to expand...

fail-owned-maze-fail1.jpg



bfw0082 said:
It was suggested that I email the site for W/D history, but I am not wasting my time on that...
Click to expand...

Copy and paste the following to save time;

Dear site, please send my withdrawal history.

Thanks.


You're welcome.
 
Don't listen to these haters OP. You just keep dumping your FR winnings to the regs and everyone will be happy. Remember it's only a problem if you admit it.

The only real question is what kind of sweet ride did you get yourself with all that cash???
 
feitr said:
Gambling problem + unemployed + horrid bankroll management + lack of poker skill = you should SERIOUSLY get help, quit poker and get a job.
Click to expand...

this is mostly your opinion, I can read players on their bets...
80 hand at 5-10, thats funny...

I am not a sit and grind style player...

I sit max buy in, lose 25% of it and leave or increase it 25%+ then leave, unless I get on a big run, then I leave when I am not running so good,

My average session is about 100-400 hands...

I have left the $1000NL tables after 8 hands, if I could double up...

I dont follow bankroll management in regards to my total bankroll because I win more at higher stakes, it is easier to put an opponent on a hand, people respect your raises, etc.

My image on those tables is TIGHT... I bet and everyone folds...
It is a small network, the same 4 people day in and day out are on all the tables.... you play with the same people, this is a huge advantage.

I am not some maniac as this small sample might lead you to believe..
sure I take chances out of position, especially if I already won $100+ and calling, or hitting a monster on the flop can result is taking someones buy in.

there are a handful of players who will not play me on that network because of how TIGHT I play or from previous sessions where I won quick and left, that is up to them. over 3 months of playing the higher stakes I built a reputation on that site, good and bad....

Now to re-build and get back to where I was.. having to play $100NL is a joke, the bad beats are crazy and people here are idiots.

Ya, out looking for a job, but here in FL the recession is bad... but I am pretty close, will be a good thing...
 
You are, without a doubt, the most delusional person i have ever "seen". However, I now know why fish continue to play poker again and again when it should be absolutely clear to them that they cannot win. You clearly think you are some sort of poker god, when i would almost guarantee that you would be unable to beat anything over nl10 over a decent sample of hands. Just do everybody here a favour and don't post your "advice" in the HA forum/anywhere else because there is enough bad advice floating around as it is.
 
bfw0082 said:
there are a handful of players who will not play me on that network because of how TIGHT I play or from previous sessions where I won quick and left, that is up to them. over 3 months of playing the higher stakes I built a reputation on that site, good and bad....
Click to expand...
Handful of winning 5/10 players? Yeah right. Names please?
 
2004 Mustang with 27,000 miles

pictured above.

WVHillbilly said:
Don't listen to these haters OP. You just keep dumping your FR winnings to the regs and everyone will be happy. Remember it's only a problem if you admit it.

The only real question is what kind of sweet ride did you get yourself with all that cash???
Click to expand...
 
This is getting less and less funny and more and more pathetic for me.

All I have to say is please dont post in the Hand Analysis threads. If if makes you feel better, maybe its because the high level skills it takes at your levels do not match the retards playing the lower levels.
 
because I dont understand the proper pot odds, use terms like 3-bet, etc. which is just you plagiarizing some book a pro wrote, and telling people when to risk money on a hand, that over 10,000 hands they will win more than they will lose...

You have any idea what your saying other than what it said in some book you read, and who is to say what is in that book is even correct, I am sure not everyone uses that one single system...

I think you guys who criticize me are very unoriginal conformists who like to sound smart by quoting or regurgitation some thing they read somewhere.

Congrats on becoming a poker theory graduate, maybe some time you will actually sit down on a poker table and play the game.
 
Reading this thread was a waste of my life, but good luck to u i hope u prove whatever your trying to prove
 
feitr said:
Gambling problem + unemployed + horrid bankroll management + lack of poker skill = you should SERIOUSLY get help, quit poker and get a job.

And while i may have been fooling around in my previous posts, i am 100% dead serious about this post. I can assure you that there is no way that these characteristics could combine in anything other than disaster.

And fwiw, i would have far more respect for you as a poker player if you did choose to grind out microstakes and play using proper roll management. Playing a limit with most of your bankroll on a table means you are doing nothing more than gambling and will go broke everytime. You aren't fooling anybody - it is time you stop trying to fool yourself.
Click to expand...

OP you should seriously listen to this.

Some of what you have posted is absolutely crazy and somewhat worrying. Suggesting you can beat 5/10 but not 100nl because of 'crazy beats' is ridiculous.

Feitr offered great advice, heed it
 
bfw0082 said:
because I dont understand the proper pot odds, use terms like 3-bet, etc. which is just you plagiarizing some book a pro wrote, and telling people when to risk money on a hand, that over 10,000 hands they will win more than they will lose...

You have any idea what your saying other than what it said in some book you read, and who is to say what is in that book is even correct, I am sure not everyone uses that one single system...

I think you guys who criticize me are very unoriginal conformists who like to sound smart by quoting or regurgitation some thing they read somewhere.

Congrats on becoming a poker theory graduate, maybe some time you will actually sit down on a poker table and play the game.
Click to expand...


just because i don't use silly book terms like "gambit" and "castle" doesn't mean my style of moving chess pieces in the way that suits my style of trying to trap the other guy's king early, and if i fail, begging for a tie, doesn't mean i'm a bad chess player


right?


RIGHT?
 
It just doesn't pay to try to bullshit the CC regs!

You guys crack me up,keep up the good work! lmao 😀



Snow 😎
 
Back
Top