US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Shouldn't a poker coach be a tax write-off??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="WEC, post: 1946291, member: 31731"] This is interesting as well for someone trying to file as professional gambler [U]Moore v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2011-173[/U] To his 2006 tax return, Moore attached a Schedule C and filed as a “pro gambler,” claiming zero “net” gambling winnings (Moore reported $25,534 of wagering losses), and $15,455 of assorted business expenses, reflecting an overall business loss of $15,455. The IRS challenged Moore’s professional gambler status, taking the position that he could not claim the business loss, and that he must itemize his wagering losses of $25,534 on Schedule A.... Because the IRS first raised the professional gambler status issue in its answer, the burden of proof was on the IRS to prove that Moore was not a professional gambler. Accordingly, the IRS was required to demonstrate that Moore did not gamble with the intent to profit. Here are the factors the court considered to make its analysis: [LIST] [*]Manner in which the taxpayer carries on the activity; [*]The expertise of the taxpayer or his advisors; [*]The time and effort expended by the taxpayer in carrying on the activity; [*]Expectation that assets used in activity may appreciate in value; [*]The success of the taxpayer in carrying on other similar or dissimilar activities; [*]The taxpayer’s history of income or losses with respect to the activity; [*]The amount of occasional profits, if any, which are earned; [*]The financial status of the taxpayer; and [*]Elements of personal pleasure or recreation. [/LIST] From the evidence presented, the decision was easy for the court to make. He didn’t keep records of his gambling activity. Big mistake. [B]Also, he had never profited from gambling, and did not seek possible ways to improve upon his performance.[/B] This case is informative for a taxpayer who asks the question: Can I file as a professional gambler? Remember, a taxpayer doesn’t have a choice. It’s a matter of whether he/she can show that the above factors as applied to particular facts and circumstances demonstrate one engaged in gambling for profit. [url]http://taxdood.com/2011/07/18/professional-v-recreational-gambler-status-in-tax-court/[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
General Poker
Shouldn't a poker coach be a tax write-off??
Top