I seriously cannot stand when someone slow rolls. Its just an all around dickhead move. Idk why you would do that to someone other than to piss them off. I understand the occidental slow roll but if you do it intentionally your just a troll.
Tiltmode1987 said:I seriously cannot stand when someone slow rolls. Its just an all around dickhead move. Idk why you would do that to someone other than to piss them off. I understand the occidental slow roll but if you do it intentionally your just a troll.
Tiltmode1987 said:I seriously cannot stand when someone slow rolls. Its just an all around dickhead move. Idk why you would do that to someone other than to piss them off. I understand the occidental slow roll but if you do it intentionally your just a troll.
TM7487 said:How is it a dickhead move. If the goal is to get all the chips and a slow roll works why wouldn't you do it
Phoenix Wright said:I think you are confusing "slowrolling" with playing a hand "slow" or "Hollywooding."
Playing a hand "slow" is to have a good hand like AA and check or call passively to induce the opponent(s) into action for you and then you can trap them later in the hand. Playing "fast" by value betting, raising and re-raising is generally more profitable, but playing "slow" is a viable strategy.
Hollywooding is a slang term for a poker player "acting" and giving the impression that their decision is tougher than it is, or that their hand is different from what they are trying to convey. This would include something like taking a long time to "think" about calling on the River when you hold an Ace-high Flush (nuts likely the best hand) but there are players after you left to act. This is justifiable by strategy because you are hoping to get the players left to act after you to put in their chips (when they would have a quick fold if they believed your hand was strong).
Slowrolling is, however, poor sportsmanship and different from the above two cases though. Slowrolling is like Hollywooding, but wasting the time when there is no strategy reason to do so. Basically, they are being a jerk by intentionally stalling the game just to crush your hopes when they finally reveal their better hand after a long wait.
The classic slowroll move is on the River when they are LAST to act with a hand which is a snap-call. Say one opponent is All-In, but the Slowroller is on the Button (last to act) and has the best possible hand on the River (something like Four of a Kind in Aces when no Straight Flush is possible). The slowroller wouldn't snap call like most would, but rather take forever to "decide" and then call after a long wait. Unlike the example above where others left to act might invest chips, the slowroller is last to act and just wastes everyone's time.
Slowrolling is arguably the most disrespectful move a poker player could make and usually players at a table would rally against a slowroller if it occurred in a game.
Here is a comical representation to illustrate what slowrolling is and how people generally react:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOPOhIxeIZE
Phoenix Wright said:Here is a comical representation to illustrate what slowrolling is and how people generally react:
Baldy86 said:it is shocking that many people in this forum dont know what slowrolling is ...
anyway . yes it is a very bad move and in my opinion it is asking for an argument even . it is one of the rudest things you can do in poker
the only time i would slowroll someone is :
1. if he/she did it to me before
2. if the person is very unlikable and has bad manners and insults people etc
other than that slowrolling a "normal" nice player is a total no go