Strange sharkscope graph

I was playo this dude tsuyoku HU and searched his sharkscope graph. There are several oddities with it. Firstly neither axis starts at 0. Secondly he never loses any buyins etc. etc. Software glitch?

(btw i'm currently 3.5 buyins up on this dude at the hu cash table, he's not quite as godlike as his graph exudes.)

very very odd, it seems to be a glitch, i dont think it is possible for him to have flat lines of no profit or loss like that... well atleast i dont think
what stakes were u playing him at

pantin007 said:

very very odd, it seems to be a glitch, i dont think it is possible for him to have flat lines of no profit or loss like that... well atleast i dont think

Click to expand...

freerolls? I mean it's possible to have $0 profit, you play in tournaments where bottom prize is money back, but there aren't many if any at all at pokerstars. I was gonna say private ones (which would explain it, it could be private freerolls) until I realized sharkscope doesn't do private tourneys (or freerolls IIRC).

I'm watching as well, you seem to be constantly moving up, and he keeps re-buying. Like taking candy from a baby .

PokerStars Game #15746186838: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2008/03/04 - 20:43:11 (ET)
Table 'Megaira' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: Tsuyoku ($50 in chips)
Seat 2: jaketrevvor ($219.45 in chips)
jaketrevvor: posts small blind $0.25
Tsuyoku: posts big blind $0.50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
jaketrevvor: raises $1 to $1.50
Tsuyoku: raises $3 to $4.50
jaketrevvor: calls $3
*** FLOP *** [Tc Kh 8s]
Tsuyoku: bets $6.50
jaketrevvor: calls $6.50
*** TURN *** [Tc Kh 8s] [9s]
Tsuyoku: bets $13.50
jaketrevvor: calls $13.50
*** RIVER *** [Tc Kh 8s 9s] [Ts]
Tsuyoku: bets $25.50 and is all-in
jaketrevvor: calls $25.50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Tsuyoku: shows [Qh Jd] (a straight, Nine to King)
jaketrevvor: mucks hand
Tsuyoku collected $99.50 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $100 | Rake $0.50
Board [Tc Kh 8s 9s Ts]
Seat 1: Tsuyoku (big blind) showed [Qh Jd] and won ($99.50) with a straight, Nine to King
Seat 2: jaketrevvor (button) (small blind) mucked

Just curious, what'd you have here?

my guess would be that he played something like K7 or K6 and didnt want to reraise cause he had no kicker.. thats my guess

pantin007 said:

my guess would be that he played something like K7 or K6 and didnt want to reraise cause he had no kicker.. thats my guess

Click to expand...

Couldn't re-raise, it was an all-in.

zachvac said:

Couldn't re-raise, it was an all-in.

Click to expand...

im talking about on the flop and turn he wouldnt raise, he just called the bet on every street

pantin007 said:

im talking about on the flop and turn he wouldnt raise, he just called the bet on every street

Click to expand...

oh ok, and now a disconnect. Hope you don't have a hand here.

lol at how bad JT's connection is, he must be bashing his computer right now thinking that the fish will get away

I was playo this dude

Click to expand...

Turning Japanese JT?

Graph would be explained if he only playing FPP SnGs... I'm just not even sure if those exist, but I remember a graph similar to that one and someone mentioning FPPs or freerolls or something.

oh yeah, didn't even think about FPP tourneys. That could very well be it, but does sharkscope track those?

I'm not sure about that either, just remembered a thread like this one and someone said it could be FPP tourneys, but I just searched and couldn't find any FPP SnGs... and I don't think sharkscope tracks MTTs, so don't take my word for it

hmm FPP sngs would fit... but I also haven't seen them and even so it doesn't explain how the graph could start in profit and not at 0 games...

zachvac said:

Just curious, what'd you have here?

Click to expand...

Argh argh argh. This is the one hand I was really angry a myself in the whole session, thanks for posting it . I had K8 (flopped 2p). The call of the 3-bet pf was standard as I was getting 2 to 1 and he cbet EVERY SINGLE ONE of his 3bets 6.50 on the flop (one of his most deliciously exploitable traits, and boy there were many) - so I'm getting uberimplied odds as well. The reason I didn't raise the flop is that 95% of the time this gets rid of him (free money all the time weeeeeee) and a few times earlier in the match I'd seen him double barrel with missed A-highs etc so I flat call with monsta 2p. Why tf I didn't shove the turn is beyond me, almost as beyond me as why I called the river when my 2p had been counterfeited as he had never tripled barreled with air and with such a scary board only ever really bets monsters here.

Sigh. Ah well, consolation is that a few hands later I was well over $200 again .

[x] tsuyoku on buddy list.



edit:

pantin007 said:

lol at how bad JT's connection is, he must be bashing his computer right now thinking that the fish will get away

Click to expand...

you have no idea. sniff.

They're winning FPP's and losing it on RING tables (building more FPPs while losing), then wins more in an FPP, then spends it on RINGS, win FPP, spend RING, win FPP, lose RINGS, win... Looks like they needs to stick to SNG's and MTT's.

he is playing fpp sng sats to sunday million (5400fpp i think)