Having read through all the posts on this thread including the one I've quoted, I'm picking up more evidence to support a theory I've held for a while, that a player wanting to build up a bankroll from micro stakes upwards might very well be better off learning the fundamentals of Omaha and grinding that format, rather than Texas, because it seems easier to find and exploit fish/inexperienced players at Omaha tables, and a higher percentage of players at Omaha tables seem to be absolute beginners (at Omaha) who are just dipping their toes into those waters for a bit of a break from Texas.