Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="kceow2981, post: 4503465, member: 310015"] I like answer A the most since it seems to be the closest to the definition. However I also like answer E because this is something that variance explains. You can go on upswings and downswings in poker as a result of variance. However over the long term the roll that variance plays in your success is minimized. So if you are still a losing player after 50k hands, that is no longer the result of variance, that is the result of your performance as a poker player. [/QUOTE]