What is more difficult in poker for you?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonnycage343
  • Start date Start date
for me they are just different, if you have mastered one discipline, then handle the second one. because both are poker
 
I think omaha because each opponent has 4 cards playing against you.
 
The most difficult thing is those bad beats, when i many time keep loosing with best hand. I just don,t understand, what,s going on. I,m pretty sure, that if i will try live games this will never happen so much times, as i,ve seen alrady in online.
 
I don't play Omaha that much thus I consider it more complex.. And when I play it..I get the impression that strategy matters a little bit less than in Hold'em..
 
Omaha I find it more complicated, because it usually has several difficult to read hand.
 
laying down a monster when i get that sinking feeling in my gut and i know i've been beat but in denial.
 
When I started playing Omaha I thought it was easier but now I think it's harder. It's so hard preflop I just don't know which hands I should play... :O
 
Omaha, I do not get it
That is why I stick with Texas Holdem
Plus there are more Texas holdem games
 
First is to make stack on begin,survive buble,survive badbeats and continue to good playing .
 
In Hold'em there are 1670 combinations of colors except in Omaha as their over 270,000 here and read more difficult!
 
CS238 said:
Omaha because of the luck involved.
Click to expand...

twoG1cup said:
Omaha. I hate having a made hand only for someone else's flush to steal it on the river.

Omaha Hi/Lo is great though
Click to expand...

Nano5722 said:
Sometimes it,s hard to keep patience for me, especially, when you keep loosing with best hands time after time. You just understand that you made the correct moves but you still can,t get the profit you deserve. So, that,s really dissapointing.
Click to expand...

toni_brasco said:
i like omaha but stopped to play it because i was almost every time loosing on the river, if i am chasing the straight or full it just simply never comes and if i am playing against someone who is chasing it always comes, i'll just stay away.
Click to expand...

Dzob said:
😀
Click to expand...
The huge variance of PLO drives me ****ing nuts. Chasing morons and luckboxes in Hold 'Em are bad enough.

I don't mind PLO and O8 in the mix, because they go away.
 
When it's WP Cheat dealing the cards, any hand will win in TH.
I swear i just busted with 88 vs a guy with T9.
I'm guessing they figure out what you're leanings are, then stick it to
you when you outplay a fish, using their #algoriggem, imo
 
It has to be Omaha, because your hand can easily transform from the best to the worst. More player will get into the actions, and a straight and even a flush is not guarenteed to win the pot. And on the other hand omaha is easier as well, cause people just always overrate their combinations, and if your brave enough, you can win huge.
Holdem for me is more predictable from the first two cards that you got. You can make more diverse moves, and from the replies you can draw authentical conclusions from the others hands.
 
Omaha for me is much more difficult because omaha is more complex it' s more complicated to count possibilities of your chances to win and it's more difficult to read opponents right
 
The most difficult for me is to keep patience. Sometimes i can play really well, but a few wrong moves can destroy lots of things. Anyway, if you can keep your patience, you can win.
 
I think more attractive Hold'em it's not only my opinion because it's more popular than Omaxa.
I like and play Hold'em but tried Omaxa.
I think Omaxa more for Omaxa fan's not for everyone.
 
Back
Top