Forum Studying vs. Solo Solvers: Do you learn better by talking or analyzing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nameless14
  • Start date Start date
Nameless14

Nameless14

Visionary
Bronze Level
KH
Poker Chips
212
Casino Coins
75
With so many advanced solver tools out there today, do you still find that posting a hand history in a forum thread and getting direct feedback from human peers is more valuable than looking at a sterile GTO chart? Why or why not?
 
Tiger Woods was quoted " I have a swing coach because I cannot see myself swing" Both solo study and then sharing with others is the best way to grow.
Other players see your action ask you why and that leads to deeper understanding of your thought process. Others can also share what they have learned that you have not yet.

🤔🤓
 
I use both and they fail differently. A solver gives me the number but not the reason, so "bet 33%" doesn't carry over to the next board. People give a reason, but it's often a story. Lately I run my own PLO hands past an LLM next to the solver output. Its explanations are wrong fairly often, but finding where is worth more to me than the chart. Do you post the hand first or run the solver first?
 
nilsharker said:
I use both and they fail differently. A solver gives me the number but not the reason, so "bet 33%" doesn't carry over to the next board. People give a reason, but it's often a story. Lately I run my own PLO hands past an LLM next to the solver output. Its explanations are wrong fairly often, but finding where is worth more to me than the chart. Do you post the hand first or run the solver first?
Click to expand...
Run the solver first, make sure to find the specific question you want to ask the forum about the spot. -then ask for the why in the forum. Be specific to get specific answers not stories.

🤔🤓
 
Back
Top