I've been looking more closely at BB vs BTN spots at 100bb, and I'm still trying to understand how wide we should actually be defending.
BTN can open pretty wide, but sometimes the BB calling range in GTO looks much wider than what feels comfortable in practice.
One hand that really made me think about this was T2s — my little “Bronson” hand 😂.
At first glance, T2s looks like an easy fold, but seeing it appear in BB defending ranges made me wonder how much of the decision comes from the price we're getting versus the actual playability of the hand.
Do you guys generally follow the solver ranges pretty closely here, or do you adjust BB defense quite a bit based on the BTN player's tendencies?
I'm particularly interested in how you think about the bottom of the BB defending range. Where do you personally draw the line, and why?
BTN can open pretty wide, but sometimes the BB calling range in GTO looks much wider than what feels comfortable in practice.
One hand that really made me think about this was T2s — my little “Bronson” hand 😂.
At first glance, T2s looks like an easy fold, but seeing it appear in BB defending ranges made me wonder how much of the decision comes from the price we're getting versus the actual playability of the hand.
Do you guys generally follow the solver ranges pretty closely here, or do you adjust BB defense quite a bit based on the BTN player's tendencies?
I'm particularly interested in how you think about the bottom of the BB defending range. Where do you personally draw the line, and why?




