I like your thoughts here it is a good share overall.
Some issues however
2- We want to think about all our actions as aggressive---for example we could aggressively check to trap or to protect our
equity or to get reads on Villains IP to us so that we might better evaluate our relative hand strength and our future street actions
Conservative is a range reference not an action reference- one might mistake conservative action for passivity which we never want to be
Passivity means we are incorrectly not being aggressive. Slow playing the nuts- delayed C-bets -delayed semi bluffs etc etc is not being conservative or passive Even when checking down
hands correctly it is not passive or conservative
3 We do not want to try to develop a sense for
bluffing- we want to develop strategies for bluffing based on board and player reads. Card removal -range advantage- nut advantage - Villain errors etc
7 GTO play is balanced play- if we play GTO strategies we never mix up our play to be unpredictable because GTO means you have the nuts and you have bluffs when you act and our V already do not know which it is. GTO play is literally unpredictable in it's design---The failure of effective use of gto strategies is what makes it seem predictable-- Funny enough when a "GTO" player does not range read correctly vs a V type they are no longer playing gto they have effectively become exploitable.
🤔🤓
As I said overall great job and I hope my thoughts may have value for you and others.