JhonnyThe357
Rock Star
Platinum Level
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2021
- Total posts
- 404
- Awards
- 2
- Poker Chips
- 291
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #1
Hi guys.
I want to share a thought that occurred to me after Adelson's post yesterday—a post about nicknames, though I commented on the software involved. To be honest, I’ve never really delved deep into that side of things, mainly because of how I view poker: simply as a hobby.
I have no ambition—and likely never will—to make a living from the sport. However, if I *did* have such an ambition, I would have certainly looked into it further and even acquired those kinds of tools; used correctly, I believe they are fundamental for anyone dreaming of making a career out of it.
In criminal law, we always advocate for respect for one of its basic principles: the *equality of arms*.
In short, while the State—acting as the accuser—has the entire public apparatus at its disposal (ranging from agents and infinite financial resources to all manner of technology like wiretaps, intercepts, and various tactics often used illegally or with ulterior motives), the citizen relies solely on their defense attorney, armed with nothing but a pen, knowledge, and a great deal of courage. It’s a tough battle, to say the least! Haha.
One thing that always makes me skeptical about online poker is the use of those famous HUDs and statistical software. From the little I understand, some of these programs record and organize data from hands played, displaying information about opponents during the match—such as raise frequency, aggression levels, and other behavioral patterns.
I know many people consider this just another support tool, but I sometimes wonder where the line is drawn between a player's actual skill and the advantage gained from the information the software provides.
In live poker, we have to observe, interpret, and remember our opponents' behavior. Online, however, some players seem to have a veritable database at their fingertips.
I’m not saying it’s cheating—after all, every platform has its own rules regarding these tools—but I do think it’s worth discussing the impact this has on the game. Are tools like these part of the natural evolution of online poker, or do they end up creating a massive advantage for those who use them? 🫡🤔
I want to share a thought that occurred to me after Adelson's post yesterday—a post about nicknames, though I commented on the software involved. To be honest, I’ve never really delved deep into that side of things, mainly because of how I view poker: simply as a hobby.
I have no ambition—and likely never will—to make a living from the sport. However, if I *did* have such an ambition, I would have certainly looked into it further and even acquired those kinds of tools; used correctly, I believe they are fundamental for anyone dreaming of making a career out of it.
In criminal law, we always advocate for respect for one of its basic principles: the *equality of arms*.
In short, while the State—acting as the accuser—has the entire public apparatus at its disposal (ranging from agents and infinite financial resources to all manner of technology like wiretaps, intercepts, and various tactics often used illegally or with ulterior motives), the citizen relies solely on their defense attorney, armed with nothing but a pen, knowledge, and a great deal of courage. It’s a tough battle, to say the least! Haha.
One thing that always makes me skeptical about online poker is the use of those famous HUDs and statistical software. From the little I understand, some of these programs record and organize data from hands played, displaying information about opponents during the match—such as raise frequency, aggression levels, and other behavioral patterns.
I know many people consider this just another support tool, but I sometimes wonder where the line is drawn between a player's actual skill and the advantage gained from the information the software provides.
In live poker, we have to observe, interpret, and remember our opponents' behavior. Online, however, some players seem to have a veritable database at their fingertips.
I’m not saying it’s cheating—after all, every platform has its own rules regarding these tools—but I do think it’s worth discussing the impact this has on the game. Are tools like these part of the natural evolution of online poker, or do they end up creating a massive advantage for those who use them? 🫡🤔
