Wasting TimeBank. Is that really clever?

Is it cleaver to waste timebank in order to let others leave a tournament?


  • Total voters
    39
SPANKYSN

SPANKYSN

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Total posts
2,291
Awards
6
CA
Poker Chips
1,399
Casino Coins
20
  • #51
Any player who has confidence in their ability would rather play more hands to possibly eliminate opponents than waste time waiting for opponents to disappear.
 
bronwen777

bronwen777

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Dec 26, 2015
Total posts
147
Awards
1
Poker Chips
285
Casino Coins
5
  • #52
I have deliberately delayed as long as possible before either folding or calling to wait for others to be knocked out to improve my chances of getting in the money.. not sure when hand for hand play comes in, but other smaller games, absolutely time bank that thing. So yeah, makes sense to me. You either play or you fold. you should know your hand strenght immediately at any time. so never need it otherwise. 👌🏻👍🏻
 
seiya1989

seiya1989

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Total posts
3,019
Awards
5
AR
Poker Chips
195
Casino Coins
10
  • #53
Only once in a while when it's really necessary, the players who consume their time on each hand are just idiots
 
P

piic

Rock Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Jun 8, 2026
Total posts
129
US
Poker Chips
59
Casino Coins
0
  • #54
I get why people think about this, especially in late reg / bubble spots, but in general it’s not really “clever” in a meaningful EV sense.

If you’re using timebank just to try to force others out of the tournament or stall the pace, you’re usually not gaining anything mathematically. You’re not changing the structure, ICM, or payouts—you're just delaying hands for everyone, including yourself. In most cases, that’s neutral or slightly negative EV because you’re reducing hands played per hour where you could actually pick up chips.
 
Top