Egon Towst said:
Sounds good, looking forward to it. 🙂
Problem. The VIP points clock up real slow if you are mainly an STT player (like me). The system seems geared much more towards ring games.
Since this beta started, I`ve made CDP my main site, and I reckon I must have played at least 20 hours (in one week 😱 ). My VIP points are still less than 100.
So, even when reduced from 2500 to 1000, it`s still a big target.
Oh, and yes, I will stay. 🙂
Hmmmm - I take your point entirely, and VIP points are not easy to accrue if you are playing tournaments only -
HOWEVER (and I probably shouldnt be sharing this with you guys, but bugger it why not.) - There is a way to accumulate VIP points bloody quick.
The rules behind getting points
(ring games this is) is that EVERY player on the table that received cards from the deal, receive a VIP point if the rake is €0.31 or above. This means that on a 1/2 table you should be able to rack up 60/80 points per hour per table - and only actually play in 20% of the
hands (depending on how tight your game is).
I had previously calculated the following table to judge how long it would take to earn 1000 points at different levels:
STAKES %Pots with VIP No of HANDS Dealt No of POTS PLAYED
0,02/0,04 1 135000 27000
0,05/0,010 5 27000 5400
0,10/0,20 18 7500 1500
0,25/0,50 45 3000 600
0,50/1 55 2455 491
1,00/2,00 70 1929 386
2,00/4,00 100 1350 270
3,00/6,00 100 1350 270
5,00/10,00 100 1350 270
The Above figures are based on averages taken from
CostaDelPoker.com, Pokerstars.com, the Prima Network and Mansion - I averaged out about 6000 hands, and used data from pokeroffice to independantly check my figures. ALSO -
The above figures are based on 35% of hands NOT reaching the flop therefore not accrueing VIP points,
and a standard "see flop" rate of 20%
Anyway - as you can see it is bloody hard getting VIP points at a decent rate until your playing AT LEAST .25/.50 (ideally 1/2).
-----------------------------------------------------------------
regarding tournament only players (or at least if you primarily play on tournaments, and if you do play cash its only the micro-limits) I am more than happy making exceptions, and allowing entry to TeamCDP events providing the user in question has played "quite a few" tournies (over a reasonable period of time.)
-------------------------------------------------------
In any case, the thinking behind the "teamCDP" concept and the reasoning to put the entry level
so high is:
1) I want to give away bloody good bonuses - ie. full
wsop packages for next year to the tournament winners
2) I dont intend it to be a "headline grabbing" advertising excercise thatll be announced everywhere- it is genuinly as a "thank you" for the players that are dedicated to
C.D.P, and I want to generate as much of a sense of community as possible.
3) I dont want there to be 5000 players qualified therefore making it a crapshoot - the tournament structure will be long (5000 chips, 15 minute blinds etc.) and any more than 1000 players I think would increase the variance too much. I would rather have 200 Great players going for it than 10,000 newbies!
-------------------------------------------------------------
If anyones got anything to add or any suggestions, feel free!
Anyway - Id better go, got a questionaire to write!!!
thanks,
Martin.