Now PokerScout is not even showing a number for 7-day average for PokerStars putting the site in 57. place. So clearly there is a problem with the way, the data is collected, and this 2.000 number was likely not real.qko911 said:
Seems they increased rake in these legendary oldschool style blind structure 9-mans too from $0,06 to $0,08
Doesn't even matter anymore since PokerStars is done but these are last remaining tourneys in poker world with this structure, thought they would at least keep these away from their evil agenda. They have no limits.
Doesn't even matter anymore since PokerStars is done but these are last remaining tourneys in poker world with this structure, thought they would at least keep these away from their evil agenda. They have no limits.
"Evil agenda" seems like very emotional words to use about something as cold as rake. But interesting that the $0,5 9-man has a different blind structure than the other limits. Did not even know that, since I never play them. The $2 and $5 9-180 man On-Demand games also has it, except there is an ante in all blind levels. Personally I dont like it, because blinds go up so fast from 50 to 200 making it even more of a push-fold game.KrazyKoo said:
Easier said than done if you like to play SnGs. While a site like ACR Poker has them, they dont run 24 hours a day. So unlike on PokerStars I can not play, when I want to, but only when the games run. At low volume hours single table SnG on ACR Poker mean, you can only get on a single table if any at all. And as for cash games no other sites give you a lower rake than 5%, so you dont save any money by playing elsewhere. Which is kind of the whole point, if you are unhappy about a rake increase 😉xOneCoolHandx said:
All that remains is to start charging for logging into the poker client.🙂Suns of Beaches said:
PokerStars rake changes explained - PokerStars Learn
PokerStars is making changes to its rake system in certain game types and buy-in levels. Here we’ll explain what’s changing and why.www.pokerstars.com
After successfully dropping freerollers, they are now going after micro players 🥲
Yeah it seems so. A change from 3.300 to 3.200 is not that significant, and during the same time GG Poker has also declined from 10.500 to 10.000, so might just be a slight seasonal decline. I was also a bit surpriced about the sudden drop, since cash game rake is not lower on other sites. And its also not that visible, so a lot of players probably dont even know, how much they pay, or that it changed 🙂Andyreas said:
In the case of cash games no, since most other sites also charge 5% rake and a few like 888 poker even more than this for 2NL and 5NL. Also for 10NL the rake went from 4,5% to 5,0%, which is not that big of a change. At 2NL and 5NL the increase was bigger, but the rake is a low amount in monetary terms, and usually 2NL-5NL are just a stepping stone to higher stakes anyway. Its not like anyone play millions of hands at 2NL-5NL and really get hit by the higher rake, especially since you can now only play 4 tables at a time.pentazepam said: