J
JEN005
Enthusiast
Silver Level
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
- Total posts
- 43
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #76
I like both sites and here's my simple comparison regarding their software, rake, reliability, player pool, game selection, staking.
Software: The PS client is more reliable compared to the GG client. For example when I have network issues, PS auto-reconnects easily after the network is fixed, while on GG I have to re-lauch the client because it won't reconnect.
Also on GG I've occasionally been timed out while my network was working fine, I could even see the action happening on the table while I was being timed out.
GG is also more resource intensive, and my old laptop can't handle more than 4-tables at once, otherwise it starts glitching. PS is fine if I turn off the Aurora graphics.
However, GG client looks cooler with its emoji faces, card squeezes etc, which makes the game more enjoyable.
Rake wise: I can't make a full comparison, but I play Spins and MTTs on the micro stakes and GG charges ~8% for MTTs and 7% for Spins, while PS charges ~11% for MTTs and starting fro ~8% for Spins.
Rakeback: To be honest, I never really liked the reward system on PS, it really feels not even getting 5% rakeback, and even that on the form of coins and tickets which have to be converted. On GG, depending on the level you're at, you get from 20%-60% cash rakeback. Right now I'm getting 33% rakeback on average.
Support: I would rate the support 6.5/10 on both sites. My main issue is the time it takes too long to get back to a player, and the lack of live support, which 888poker offers for instance.
Withdrawals/Reliability: Never had an issue with withdrawing on PS, the money arrives quite quickly. Still, I've heard stories about people getting their account randomly frozen, so I don't like the idea of keeping a lot of money there.
As for GG, I have yet to make my first withdrawal, so I can't comment. But given their expansion and the inclusion of big series like wsop, they have to be correct with the players.
Regarding the stories about some regs getting banned previously on GG for "bum hunting", they recently tried making it right by giving the banned players a chance to rejoin the network. That said, I still wouldn't trust the site with large amounts.
Player Pool: On GG the player pool seems to be much more diverse then PS, specifically there seem to be a lot more Asians who have not been exposed to high levels of poker. On PS players tend to be more skilled, and there seems to be a high % of Russian players who seem to be both of above-average skill and quite aggressive.
Very recently, GGPoker seems to have surpassed PS regarding the number of active players.
Game selection: Given the PS's long experience and historically large user-base, they have a wider selection of games and MTTs. On GG the SNGs seem to be missing, but otherwise there is plenty to choose from.
Staking: Pokerstars doesn't support staking. GG has a very well implemented in-client staking which is very convenient for many players, making staking much easier and transparent, and also allowing players to engage and "invest" and possibly generating some profit by not even playing.
Software: The PS client is more reliable compared to the GG client. For example when I have network issues, PS auto-reconnects easily after the network is fixed, while on GG I have to re-lauch the client because it won't reconnect.
Also on GG I've occasionally been timed out while my network was working fine, I could even see the action happening on the table while I was being timed out.
GG is also more resource intensive, and my old laptop can't handle more than 4-tables at once, otherwise it starts glitching. PS is fine if I turn off the Aurora graphics.
However, GG client looks cooler with its emoji faces, card squeezes etc, which makes the game more enjoyable.
Rake wise: I can't make a full comparison, but I play Spins and MTTs on the micro stakes and GG charges ~8% for MTTs and 7% for Spins, while PS charges ~11% for MTTs and starting fro ~8% for Spins.
Rakeback: To be honest, I never really liked the reward system on PS, it really feels not even getting 5% rakeback, and even that on the form of coins and tickets which have to be converted. On GG, depending on the level you're at, you get from 20%-60% cash rakeback. Right now I'm getting 33% rakeback on average.
Support: I would rate the support 6.5/10 on both sites. My main issue is the time it takes too long to get back to a player, and the lack of live support, which 888poker offers for instance.
Withdrawals/Reliability: Never had an issue with withdrawing on PS, the money arrives quite quickly. Still, I've heard stories about people getting their account randomly frozen, so I don't like the idea of keeping a lot of money there.
As for GG, I have yet to make my first withdrawal, so I can't comment. But given their expansion and the inclusion of big series like wsop, they have to be correct with the players.
Regarding the stories about some regs getting banned previously on GG for "bum hunting", they recently tried making it right by giving the banned players a chance to rejoin the network. That said, I still wouldn't trust the site with large amounts.
Player Pool: On GG the player pool seems to be much more diverse then PS, specifically there seem to be a lot more Asians who have not been exposed to high levels of poker. On PS players tend to be more skilled, and there seems to be a high % of Russian players who seem to be both of above-average skill and quite aggressive.
Very recently, GGPoker seems to have surpassed PS regarding the number of active players.
Game selection: Given the PS's long experience and historically large user-base, they have a wider selection of games and MTTs. On GG the SNGs seem to be missing, but otherwise there is plenty to choose from.
Staking: Pokerstars doesn't support staking. GG has a very well implemented in-client staking which is very convenient for many players, making staking much easier and transparent, and also allowing players to engage and "invest" and possibly generating some profit by not even playing.
Last edited:











