S
SheldonMS
Enthusiast
Silver Level
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2021
- Total posts
- 57
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #1
The PS greatly reduced the SNGs on the grid. How can we compensate for this reduction in options?
Maxmustdie said:SNG is almost dead on all poker rooms
only pokerstars still have at least some tournaments
SNG killed by bots, schools and cartels
SheldonMS said:The PS greatly reduced the SNGs on the grid. How can we compensate for this reduction in options?
Maxmustdie said:SNG is almost dead on all poker rooms. only pokerstars still have at least some tournaments
Maxmustdie said:SNG killed by bots, schools and cartels
1nsomn1a said:SNGs have already been calculated and solved, and this format is not as interesting as before.
Alexey Shley said:Pokerstars increased the number in the room for one nine people and I really like three prizes, and the entries to such tournaments have become favorable
Biohazard858 said:I used to like, play and win in the 2.5 usd sng 180 player. I was disappointed to see it go, now i have to find another similar sng
fundiver199 said:The closest will be the new 2$ 18-180 man. During peak hours it reaches 100+ players. Still not quite the same, but at least there is much less waiting time.....
Biohazard858 said:I saw the new one, but the winning margins were quite not the same.
Biohazard858 said:but we have to adapt.
fundiver199 said:On the upside the new 5$ 18-45 and 18-180 man at least run frequently except during low volume hours. With the old game selection it was getting more and more difficult to get action, if you wanted to play with more than 18 people and for more than 3,5$ at a time. And for those who prefer regular speed games, there are still a lot of regular speed 9-mans, which also tend to run rather frequently. If players accept the "on demand" format, and more people start to play SnGs again, perhaps some more games can eventually be added back in. But until then I guess, Pokerstars will be satisfied offering a more limited number of games, that run more frequently.
nairolph87 said:just saw they took away that 0.02 cent game and all the games for 10 cents too, that was a bit unnecessary in my opinion, since these were great to play on the site for have more tables open and for people with almost no bankroll.
fundiver199 said:I dont have any problem with this. If people cant afford to play for 25c, they can go to the play money tables and practice there![]()
nairolph87 said:looks like they really want to put their traffic together and make sure at least some games are running regularly.
Yes so it was generally not a bad idea of them. Better have less game offerings instead of to much games that never fill up. There is nothing more annoying then wait for games to start if you want to play.fundiver199 said:Sure and I think, it has worked. The new 5$ 18-45 man does not run 24 hours. But in european evening hours it runs much more frequently than the old 3,5$ 45-mans or any of the other games, it replaced.
nairolph87 said:Yes so it was generally not a bad idea of them. Better have less game offerings instead of to much games that never fill up. There is nothing more annoying then wait for games to start if you want to play.