Fulltilt Poker is & always will be my favorite!
Pokerstars was a close 2nd (before 'Aurora' nonsense) < getting worse all the time
DoylesRoom when it was back on microgaming
Partypoker - getting better all the time... slowly but surely (of all the sites, this is one that seems to be heading in the right direction for the players)
Pokerstars was a close 2nd (before 'Aurora' nonsense) < getting worse all the time
DoylesRoom when it was back on microgaming
Partypoker - getting better all the time... slowly but surely (of all the sites, this is one that seems to be heading in the right direction for the players)
I play on PokerStars, 888, Party Poker, and GGPoker. The one I find myself on most is 888 - its basic but easy to find my way around. It might not be very pretty, buts it has always functioned well for me and when I wanted to withdraw my money - they paid it out. So I feel its tried and true and its the one I’m most loyal to.
For me it is always going to be Poker Stars, I like the design, even when they update it every certain amount of time and you don't know where are the tournaments you like hehe, this is talking about the design for PC ok, because in the last update for android they did a mess, now you cannot find tournaments, if you live in a latin country they automatically change your language to spanish and now you need to activate your location in order to play with it. I really don't like to be doing that every time I logged in.
My favorite design is still pokerstars. High attendance. The game in the room takes place around the clock, cash tables are full at all limits, thousands of people register for tournaments.
Profitable promotions. Interesting temporary promotions often take place on PokerStars, new bonus codes appear.
Modern games. PokerStars was the first to introduce the latest poker formats to its client.
But the room also has a drawback - an incomprehensible loyalty system. The very first chests contain not very good prizes, and the number of points required to receive a gift depends on the play style. This confuses players and begs the question: why do different players need different points for the same chest?
Profitable promotions. Interesting temporary promotions often take place on PokerStars, new bonus codes appear.
Modern games. PokerStars was the first to introduce the latest poker formats to its client.
But the room also has a drawback - an incomprehensible loyalty system. The very first chests contain not very good prizes, and the number of points required to receive a gift depends on the play style. This confuses players and begs the question: why do different players need different points for the same chest?
Good point
I too have been playing for a significant amount of time. Although decades longer. But functionality and ease of use is the most important aspect as far as online poker goes.
Live poker is preferable and in that situation, design, atmosphere and staff matter most.
infonazar said:
I too have been playing for a significant amount of time. Although decades longer. But functionality and ease of use is the most important aspect as far as online poker goes.
Live poker is preferable and in that situation, design, atmosphere and staff matter most.
FullTilt Skyline Tables and Hollywood Poker
I loved the Original Fulltilt Skyline Tables https://prnt.sc/ztap15
A close second was Hollywood Pokers https://prnt.sc/ztayah
Both were always a lot of fun to play at and was very upset to know when they both went under but both were entertaining but as an American now we have very limited choices but atleast we have a few to fill our addictions. 😎
I loved the Original Fulltilt Skyline Tables https://prnt.sc/ztap15
A close second was Hollywood Pokers https://prnt.sc/ztayah
Both were always a lot of fun to play at and was very upset to know when they both went under but both were entertaining but as an American now we have very limited choices but atleast we have a few to fill our addictions. 😎
The Cali choices..
In California, you're choices are limited. I play ACR, migrated from Doyle's Room. I also play BCP, same company. The graphics, avatars, layouts are not the slickest, most polished. But I am used to it. No complaints.
In California, you're choices are limited. I play ACR, migrated from Doyle's Room. I also play BCP, same company. The graphics, avatars, layouts are not the slickest, most polished. But I am used to it. No complaints.
Although I consider the functionality of the software to be a much more important element, the pleasant design also contributes to the complete enjoyment of the game.
I like the design of these applications the most in the following order:
1. PokerStars 2. GGpoker 3. SWCpoker
I like the design of these applications the most in the following order:
1. PokerStars 2. GGpoker 3. SWCpoker
I do not care much, how they wrote above, functionality is one of the most important, even the design count a bit, as I have to look at that for long hours, that's why I do not really like most of the poker room designs nowadays, most of them are going to the 'funny' free slot mobile games direction. What is annoying to watch all the time.
So the best platform for me is the WPN/ACR from this point of view, too. Betonline/SB is enough good, too. Both could have a bit more improvement, mostly not about the design, but table settings, especially the small window's settings, set ups, personalizing, however it is still okay for me how it is nowadays.
So the best platform for me is the WPN/ACR from this point of view, too. Betonline/SB is enough good, too. Both could have a bit more improvement, mostly not about the design, but table settings, especially the small window's settings, set ups, personalizing, however it is still okay for me how it is nowadays.
