BetOnline (Chico Network) now supported by PokerTracker4

  • Thread starter Thread starter BUSB0Y
  • Start date Start date
BUSB0Y

BUSB0Y

Rock Star
Silver Level
Poker Chips
4
Casino Coins
0
Hi everyone-- I just found out today when updating my PokerTracker4 that Chico was added. Chico network includes Bet Online. BOL doesn't have nearly as much traffic as ACR, but in my opinion, it's soooo much softer. Well that softness may end soon with this PT4 update.

However, I can't get the hand histories to import.

Is this supposed to be a native integration? Or do we still need a 3rd party hand converter? Hmmm perhaps this is better posted in PT4 forum but figured there are more people viewing this one and perhaps someone has figured it out already?
 
softer? as in full of Bots ? I guess.

If I could sigh loudly over the internet I would.

HUDsthe herpes of online poker .
 
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: BUSB0Y
sorry for the negativity there. but I'm sure others use it and will chime. in eventually. sorry for the vent. I would stay far away from BOL.
 
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: BUSB0Y and abwil2
I dont find it any softer if anything its more common to get beat by runner runner and worse hands
 
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: BUSB0Y
Criplgamer said:
softer? as in full of Bots ? I guess.

If I could sigh loudly over the internet I would.

HUDsthe herpes of online poker .
Click to expand...

Criplgamer said:
sorry for the negativity there. but I'm sure others use it and will chime. in eventually. sorry for the vent. I would stay far away from BOL.
Click to expand...

Lol no worries brutha, I can only ask that you be honest and appreciate you chiming in!


Well I'm just speaking from experience. I haven't played a ton, but I will keep this thread updated:

Here's my sharkscope for WPN as of today (search BUSB0Y with a zero for both networks)

6543b7f540242354ca6dbee932a6c373.png


for BetOnline

2c2ff372b9a311d5f99d157f147dca0a.png


If both sites have bots, then the bots on BOL are easier to play against.

abwil2 said:
I dont find it any softer if anything its more common to get beat by runner runner and worse hands
Click to expand...

Edgerik said:
Chico poker support requires a third-party hand converter to write hand histories and display a HUD.

https://www.advancedpokertools.com/products/ChicoConverter/
Click to expand...

thanks!


Maybe I'm just on a heater, who knows!? will keep everyone updated.
 
BUSB0Y said:
Hi everyone-- I just found out today when updating my PokerTracker4 that Chico was added. Chico network includes Bet Online. BOL doesn't have nearly as much traffic as ACR, but in my opinion, it's soooo much softer. Well that softness may end soon with this PT4 update.

However, I can't get the hand histories to import.

Is this supposed to be a native integration? Or do we still need a 3rd party hand converter? Hmmm perhaps this is better posted in PT4 forum but figured there are more people viewing this one and perhaps someone has figured it out already?
Click to expand...


They don't support it. They just said they did in their release notes, and are partnering w/ a 3rd party converter.

That same converter has always worked with it, as does the BOL card catcher (which is cheaper):

https://www.acepokersolutions.com/betonline-hud-catcher/

Drivehud has full native support, no 3rd party Apps needed:
https://drivehud.com

As far as the Chico network itself, it's a good site to play on. Decent amount of tables, and somewhat soft.
 
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: BUSB0Y
John A said:
They don't support it. They just said they did in their release notes, and are partnering w/ a 3rd party converter.

That same converter has always worked with it, as does the BOL card catcher (which is cheaper):

https://www.acepokersolutions.com/betonline-hud-catcher/

Drivehud has full native support, no 3rd party apps needed:
https://drivehud.com

As far as the Chico network itself, it's a good site to play on. Decent amount of tables, and somewhat soft.
Click to expand...


awesome, thanks for the clarification John.
 
Edgerik said:
Chico poker support requires a third-party hand converter to write hand histories and display a HUD.

https://www.advancedpokertools.com/products/ChicoConverter/
Click to expand...


Wow, that's a costly setup. good if you only plan to have a HUD once in awhile, you can choose to just purchase the the converter for the time you play.(Day-$2/week-$8/month-$15/year-$60)
But if you plan to run a HUD everytime, betonline card catcher is cheaper where you only pay the full price once then renew a third the price.

well..... if you don't mind changing database, DriveHUD is the the most less costly in tracking chico network.
 
Back
Top