I have both of them . I'm using PokerTracker when I'm playing spin and go , tournaments or sit and go , and Holdem manager when I'm playing cash.
I find both of them very easy to use and very helpfull , usually I'm looking at how many hands are they playing and how agresive they are from each position . I heard about copilot hud also but never used it .
I find both of them very easy to use and very helpfull , usually I'm looking at how many hands are they playing and how agresive they are from each position . I heard about copilot hud also but never used it .
Poker tracker vs Holdem manager
Hello, in my opinion I like the Holdem manager more, for a convenience issue. but I want to recommend the Hand2note for those who are just starting, it is free up to certain stakes, very complete and useful. regards
Hello, in my opinion I like the Holdem manager more, for a convenience issue. but I want to recommend the Hand2note for those who are just starting, it is free up to certain stakes, very complete and useful. regards
Tomiveres said:
If you play mostly tournament but like to dabble in Spins and Grand Tour (3 and 4 handed) but you wish to separate data collection (or disable) so the spin or short handed data does not corrupt the tournament data when you go back and analyze your play, which one would you recommend ?
Freewka6101129 said:
That is hilarious! Is studying also weak? Calculating outs? Calculating EV? Pot odds?
Call me weak. I prefer to consider myself INFORMED.
HUDs are not for everyone, and they can misinform you if you do not understand the stats...but generally, HUDs provide yet another area of "edge" in your game.
At the end of the day, I couldn't care less is someone calls me weak whilst giving me all their chips. A win is a win.
Cheers,
ObbleeXY