$33 NL HE MTT: 95S

G

Geo90

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Total posts
439
HU
Poker Chips
429
Casino Coins
0
  • #1
Game
Hold'em
Game Format
No Limit
Table Format
MTT
Buy-in
33
Currency
$
888Poker, Hold'em No Limit - 300/600 (70 ante) - 8 players
Replay this hand on CardsChat - https://www.cardschat.com/replayer?hand=2a1bcOrU

abarone68 (UTG): 19,860 (33 bb)
PeakyCollins (UTG+1): 30,205 (50 bb)
ReginaCaze (MP): 19,290 (32 bb)
zimablue. (MP+1): 29,635 (49 bb)
Paciraro (CO): 18,088 (30 bb)
alta52 (BU): 71,515 (119 bb)
LODDENThinks (SB): 37,447 (62 bb)
Gyurika90 (BB): 49,294 (82 bb)

Pre-Flop: (1,460) Hero (Gyurika90) is BB with 9♠ 5♠
abarone68 (UTG) raises to 1,200, 4 players fold, alta52 (BU) calls 1,200, 1 fold, Gyurika90 (BB) calls 600

Flop: (4,460) T♠ 8♠ 6♥ (3 players)
Gyurika90 (BB) checks, abarone68 (UTG) bets 1,471, alta52 (BU) folds, Gyurika90 (BB) calls 1,471

Turn: (7,402) 5♥ (2 players)
Gyurika90 (BB) checks, abarone68 (UTG) checks

River: (7,402) K♠ (2 players)
Gyurika90 (BB) bets 4,885, abarone68 (UTG) raises to 17,119 (all-in), Gyurika90 (BB) calls 12,234



PF: I think defending is standard.

F: I got a pretty good flop; I think a 3-bet would have been too aggressive here, so I just called.

T: I also picked up a pair; would it have been worth raising here?

R: My flush came, would it have been better to check here? Let him bluff—he might have a lot of missed straights like Q9, J9, JQ, and he could also have a lot of Kx hands he could raise with. My 9 can block a lot of bluffs from these ranges, but I couldn’t fold on the river; checking might have been the better play.
He’ll have a lot of Ax flushes too. How would you have played it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garik777
miklcct

miklcct

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 20, 2025
Total posts
295
GB
Poker Chips
205
Casino Coins
0
  • #2
Pre-flop: standard call
Flop: With such bet sizing, standard call
Turn: with a bottom pair, checking is fine, looking to see the river cheaply. You don't want getting raised against it.
River: I would bet like you, as if he misses completely, he will check.
 
kunkgreen

kunkgreen

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jun 1, 2022
Total posts
1,545
Awards
4
BR
Poker Chips
742
Casino Coins
10
  • #3
PF:
Standart defense!
(I know a lot of people who would bet on that against UTG, lol)

FLOP:
I also think the check/call is standard, but I don't think it was a big mistake to have check/call here... I believe the flop range is favorable and sometimes we have some benefit in raising, perhaps denying equity from hands like KQ, AJ+? Well, I think it's a possible line, but not the standard one!

TURN:
Another card theoretically favorable to our range.

A check is okay with the way it's been played so far, we have even more equity (I believe) and we can see the river for free to improve our hand, as ended up happening.

I also wouldn't find it too strange if we started betting here, but I also believe that checking is the standard play.


RIVER:
Well, I think a good card finally came for the villain, but now it's completed our flush.

We could bet low here to induce him to bluff or get some change for the Kx... But I think a big bet (like 100% to 125% of the pot is viable) works better to extract from hands like KK, KT, AA. (These hands wouldn't check on the turn, buuuut...)

He might also be blocking the nut flush with the Ace of Spades, but he still has AJs, AQs... We're not the nuts, but we still beat a large part of his range that got this far in this way.

I think it's a good call... Although I can't think of many bluffs the villain could have here, unless he blocked with the Ace of Spades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo90 and Poker Orifice
F

fundiver199

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Total posts
16,301
Awards
2
Poker Chips
1,130
Casino Coins
0
  • #4
Preflop
Standard defend.

Flop
You have a 12-out draw with no showdown value, so I prefer to take the aggressive route here and check-raise, especially when he only bet 1/3 pot. If you get a hand like AK to fold, thats a great outcome, and if he 3-bet, you can just get it in and hope to run good.

Turn
As played definitely a check-call, and you are happy to get a free card.

River
I agree with betting for value, since he can easily have a hand like AK or KQ, that will call a bet but not bet for value if checked to. When he raise, its not great. He can definitely have a better flush, but he could also be bluffing with the naked ace of spades or perhaps overplaying KK etc, and you are getting better than 2:1. So no you cant fold, even though I would expect to be beat at least half the time against an unknown opponent.

Getting overflushed on a 3-flush board is always annoying, when it happen, but its actually pretty rare. So just chuck it up to a cooler and move on to the next hand. At least if its heads-up and not insanely deep like in this hand. If its multiway, and there is like a bet, a raise and then a cold 3-bet, ok maybe now you let go of a low flush. But not for 33 BB against a single opponent.
 
eetenor

eetenor

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Total posts
2,870
Awards
2
Poker Chips
681
Casino Coins
0
  • #5
Geo90 said:
888Poker, Hold'em No Limit - 300/600 (70 ante) - 8 players
Replay this hand on CardsChat - https://www.cardschat.com/replayer?hand=2a1bcOrU

abarone68 (UTG): 19,860 (33 bb)
PeakyCollins (UTG+1): 30,205 (50 bb)
ReginaCaze (MP): 19,290 (32 bb)
zimablue. (MP+1): 29,635 (49 bb)
Paciraro (CO): 18,088 (30 bb)
alta52 (BU): 71,515 (119 bb)
LODDENThinks (SB): 37,447 (62 bb)
Gyurika90 (BB): 49,294 (82 bb)

Pre-Flop: (1,460) Hero (Gyurika90) is BB with 9♠ 5♠
abarone68 (UTG) raises to 1,200, 4 players fold, alta52 (BU) calls 1,200, 1 fold, Gyurika90 (BB) calls 600

Flop: (4,460) T♠ 8♠ 6♥ (3 players)
Gyurika90 (BB) checks, abarone68 (UTG) bets 1,471, alta52 (BU) folds, Gyurika90 (BB) calls 1,471

Turn: (7,402) 5♥ (2 players)
Gyurika90 (BB) checks, abarone68 (UTG) checks

River: (7,402) K♠ (2 players)
Gyurika90 (BB) bets 4,885, abarone68 (UTG) raises to 17,119 (all-in), Gyurika90 (BB) calls 12,234



PF: I think defending is standard.

F: I got a pretty good flop; I think a 3-bet would have been too aggressive here, so I just called.

T: I also picked up a pair; would it have been worth raising here?

R: My flush came, would it have been better to check here? Let him bluff—he might have a lot of missed straights like Q9, J9, JQ, and he could also have a lot of Kx hands he could raise with. My 9 can block a lot of bluffs from these ranges, but I couldn’t fold on the river; checking might have been the better play.
He’ll have a lot of Ax flushes too. How would you have played it?
Watching replay 1 step at a time

Preflop

We want to build a strategy framework that we can apply to multiple hands so that we do not have to think what do I do with 95s now when we see it. Instead we know it is part of a group of hands that we play the same way.

1 How strong of a hand is 95s? HU? 3 way? Can we realize all of its equity? How well does it play vs UTG range?
Will the 9 be dominated when we make a pair? Is it a big pot hand? Is it a good bluff hand? When we bluff does it block UTG folds?

When we take the time to think about the strength of a hand before we even play- we will be able to design strategies to play it in game most effectively.


:unsure::geek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo90 and monkeytilter
monkeytilter

monkeytilter

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Apr 12, 2020
Total posts
1,728
Awards
3
Poker Chips
462
Casino Coins
55
  • #6
eetenor said:
Watching replay 1 step at a time

Preflop

We want to build a strategy framework that we can apply to multiple hands so that we do not have to think what do I do with 95s now when we see it. Instead we know it is part of a group of hands that we play the same way.

1 How strong of a hand is 95s? HU? 3 way? Can we realize all of its equity? How well does it play vs UTG range?
Will the 9 be dominated when we make a pair? Is it a big pot hand? Is it a good bluff hand? When we bluff does it block UTG folds?

When we take the time to think about the strength of a hand before we even play- we will be able to design strategies to play it in game most effectively.


:unsure::geek:
Key here is "realising equity"(y)
Love all the "this is an auto call pre" in the thread, yes GTO indicates it's a defend but GTO will play it perfectly post flop (with bluffs most wouldn't even dream of) and even then probably only eke out less than 0.5bb profit from the spot - look at the pickle you got into hitting one of the best hands you can make!

On the river, this is an under-bluffed spot IMHO.
Villain is risking his tourney life for a pot he has not invested that much in and you have bet into on the river.

We need villain to be bluffing about 1/3 of the time on the river given the price we are getting - I'd want a read on villain to be making this call (is he capable of big bluffs or making polarisation errors etc.)

I like your river bet (population tend to check back too much) if you have the discipline to bet-fold to the shove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo90 and eetenor
Poker Orifice

Poker Orifice

And Still...
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Total posts
28,482
Awards
6
CA
Poker Chips
989
Casino Coins
5
  • #7
fundiver199 said:
Preflop
Standard defend.

Flop
You have a 12-out draw with no showdown value, so I prefer to take the aggressive route here and check-raise, especially when he only bet 1/3 pot. If you get a hand like AK to fold, thats a great outcome, and if he 3-bet, you can just get it in and hope to run good.

Turn
As played definitely a check-call, and you are happy to get a free card.

River
I agree with betting for value, since he can easily have a hand like AK or KQ, that will call a bet but not bet for value if checked to. When he raise, its not great. He can definitely have a better flush, but he could also be bluffing with the naked ace of spades or perhaps overplaying KK etc, and you are getting better than 2:1. So no you cant fold, even though I would expect to be beat at least half the time against an unknown opponent.

Getting overflushed on a 3-flush board is always annoying, when it happen, but its actually pretty rare. So just chuck it up to a cooler and move on to the next hand. At least if its heads-up and not insanely deep like in this hand. If its multiway, and there is like a bet, a raise and then a cold 3-bet, ok maybe now you let go of a low flush. But not for 33 BB against a single opponent.
Aaron Barone (villain) is the most well-known MTT player on 888Poker.
member of 888 Stream Team,
#1 MTT player on 888 team.
is MTT coach for Upswing Poker
One of the top MidStakes online MTT players in the World today. (has yearly profit over $200k for 5 years straight)
regularly 20-24 tables (early in schedule)
100+ MTT's per day, with abi of ~$80

He has a 'challenge' this coming Wednesday, live streamed on Twitch, playing 150+ MTT's in one day, abi $40(?), must finish in profit!
(currently taking bets on this at 1:1 , cut-off time for this is Monday)
 
Poker Orifice

Poker Orifice

And Still...
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Total posts
28,482
Awards
6
CA
Poker Chips
989
Casino Coins
5
  • #8
monkeytilter said:
Key here is "realising equity"(y)
Love all the "this is an auto call pre" in the thread, yes GTO indicates it's a defend but GTO will play it perfectly post flop (with bluffs most wouldn't even dream of) and even then probably only eke out less than 0.5bb profit from the spot - look at the pickle you got into hitting one of the best hands you can make!

On the river, this is an under-bluffed spot IMHO.
Villain is risking his tourney life for a pot he has not invested that much in and you have bet into on the river.

We need villain to be bluffing about 1/3 of the time on the river given the price we are getting - I'd want a read on villain to be making this call (is he capable of big bluffs or making polarisation errors etc.)

I like your river bet (population tend to check back too much) if you have the discipline to bet-fold to the shove.

Villain is definitely capable of big bluffs. It's Aaron 'fk_n' Barone ... LFG!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: monkeytilter
monkeytilter

monkeytilter

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Apr 12, 2020
Total posts
1,728
Awards
3
Poker Chips
462
Casino Coins
55
  • #9
Poker Orifice said:
Villain is definitely capable of big bluffs. It's Aaron 'fk_n' Barone ... LFG!!!
" I'd want a read on villain.."

What is their thought process though even if they are capable?
They are now relying on hero to be capable of betting thin enough (or bluffing often enough) where they can find a fold?
They need that read on hero in a population that doesn't bet thin enough and doesn't make enough good folds?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: eetenor
Poker Orifice

Poker Orifice

And Still...
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Total posts
28,482
Awards
6
CA
Poker Chips
989
Casino Coins
5
  • #10
G

Geo90

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Total posts
439
HU
Poker Chips
429
Casino Coins
0
  • #11
miklcct said:
Pre-flop: standard call
Flop: With such bet sizing, standard call
Turn: with a bottom pair, checking is fine, looking to see the river cheaply. You don't want getting raised against it.
River: I would bet like you, as if he misses completely, he will check.
On River, I'm getting such a bad pot odds that I can't fold!
 
G

Geo90

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Total posts
439
HU
Poker Chips
429
Casino Coins
0
  • #12
kunkgreen said:
PF:
Standart defense!
(I know a lot of people who would bet on that against UTG, lol)

FLOP:
I also think the check/call is standard, but I don't think it was a big mistake to have check/call here... I believe the flop range is favorable and sometimes we have some benefit in raising, perhaps denying equity from hands like KQ, AJ+? Well, I think it's a possible line, but not the standard one!

TURN:
Another card theoretically favorable to our range.

A check is okay with the way it's been played so far, we have even more equity (I believe) and we can see the river for free to improve our hand, as ended up happening.

I also wouldn't find it too strange if we started betting here, but I also believe that checking is the standard play.


RIVER:
Well, I think a good card finally came for the villain, but now it's completed our flush.

We could bet low here to induce him to bluff or get some change for the Kx... But I think a big bet (like 100% to 125% of the pot is viable) works better to extract from hands like KK, KT, AA. (These hands wouldn't check on the turn, buuuut...)

He might also be blocking the nut flush with the Ace of Spades, but he still has AJs, AQs... We're not the nuts, but we still beat a large part of his range that got this far in this way.

I think it's a good call... Although I can't think of many bluffs the villain could have here, unless he blocked with the Ace of Spades.
PF I'm leaning toward folding;
GTO calls for a wide defense, but I've lost big many times because of that

Turn: I wanted to check-raise—I had plenty of outs, and I don’t think the 5th card strengthens his hand

I can’t imagine many bluffs either; I might have a straight, a flush, or a set, so even with a lot of Kx hands, he’ll probably just call on the river
 
Sunz of Beaches

Sunz of Beaches

Sunz Tzu
Platinum Level
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Total posts
6,246
Awards
2
Poker Chips
2,542
Casino Coins
375
  • #13
Poker Orifice said:
Villain is definitely capable of big bluffs. It's Aaron 'fk_n' Barone ... LFG!!!
Yeah but as u said he plays many many tables and this is a spot where he faces a decent bet on the river while his opponent has a lot of flushes in his range. Would be very very surprised if he just goes "nuts" here on a pure bluff. Most likely has a higher flush shoving there.

Played against him once on wpt and in one hour he played like zero hands. Not that this matters too much and not that i have a real idea about his game now after watching only 1 hour of his play but i think its probably a misconception to think those crushers are bluffing all the time, especially in spots like this, while playing a gazillion tables.

Is he capable? Yes sure
Is this a spot he would do it or where its a good idea to do it in general? Imo no. Too risky to get ur opponent off a low flush that he has certainly in his range. And im sure he knows that.
 
G

Geo90

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Total posts
439
HU
Poker Chips
429
Casino Coins
0
  • #14
fundiver199 said:
Preflop
Standard defend.

Flop
You have a 12-out draw with no showdown value, so I prefer to take the aggressive route here and check-raise, especially when he only bet 1/3 pot. If you get a hand like AK to fold, thats a great outcome, and if he 3-bet, you can just get it in and hope to run good.

Turn
As played definitely a check-call, and you are happy to get a free card.

River
I agree with betting for value, since he can easily have a hand like AK or KQ, that will call a bet but not bet for value if checked to. When he raise, its not great. He can definitely have a better flush, but he could also be bluffing with the naked ace of spades or perhaps overplaying KK etc, and you are getting better than 2:1. So no you cant fold, even though I would expect to be beat at least half the time against an unknown opponent.

Getting overflushed on a 3-flush board is always annoying, when it happen, but its actually pretty rare. So just chuck it up to a cooler and move on to the next hand. At least if its heads-up and not insanely deep like in this hand. If its multiway, and there is like a bet, a raise and then a cold 3-bet, ok maybe now you let go of a low flush. But not for 33 BB against a single opponent.
Pf: According to GTO, this is a clear defense. I was wondering if it wouldn't be better to play tight defense? That way I could avoid situations like this.



F: Yeah, this flop is clearly better for my hand strength, and it doesn't open the pot very wide. One good option is to 3-bet up to 4-4,500.



R: The opponent is a strong reg, an official 888 player :D, capable of huge bluffs.

I also think it was no longer possible to fold, and of course he had a better hand; somehow I keep running into situations like this lately.
Abarone
 
  • Like
Reactions: kunkgreen
F

fundiver199

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Total posts
16,301
Awards
2
Poker Chips
1,130
Casino Coins
0
  • #15
Geo90 said:
Pf: According to GTO, this is a clear defense. I was wondering if it wouldn't be better to play tight defense? That way I could avoid situations like this.
I dont think, its a big mistake to just fold preflop, especially when another guy has already called. Its protects you from making costly mistakes against a tight UTG range and - pontentially - a tough opponent, which you would rather avoid. But the rest of the hand is just a cooler. If he bet the turn, there is no way, you can fold a flushdraw +gutshot + pair, and then there is only a single bet left for the river. And obviously you are not going to check-fold the river, when you just made your flush. You are either going to jam for value or check-call, and either way get the bad news, that your opponent has the nuts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geo90 and eetenor
G

Geo90

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Total posts
439
HU
Poker Chips
429
Casino Coins
0
  • #16
eetenor said:
Lépésről lépésre visszajátszás nézése

Preflop

Egy olyan stratégiai keretrendszert szeretnénk létrehozni, amelyet több kézre is alkalmazhatunk, így nem kell azon gondolkodnunk, hogy mit kezdjünk a 95-ösökkel, amikor meglátjuk őket. Ehelyett tudjuk, hogy egy olyan kézcsoport része, amelyet ugyanúgy játszunk.

1. Milyen erős kéz a 95s? HU? 3-way? Realizálhatjuk a teljes részesedését? Mennyire jól játszik az UTG skálával szemben?
Dominál a 9-es, ha párt kapunk? Nagy potban játszható? Jól blöffölhetünk vele? Amikor blöffölünk, blokkolja az UTG dobásait?

Ha már a játék megkezdése előtt időt szánunk arra, hogy átgondoljuk egy kéz erősségét, akkor képesek leszünk olyan stratégiákat kidolgozni, amelyekkel a leghatékonyabban tudjuk játszani a játékban.


:bizonytalan::geek:
Thank you all for your comments and I apologize for replying so late!


As you can see, 95 performs very poorly against BU; even with a pair of 95, 9, we will often be at a disadvantage. The UTG scale includes many 9s: A9s, K9s, Q9s, J9s, T9s.

BU probably has a lot of 9s as well.
Kpernykp 2026 04 21 204821 Kpernykp 2026 04 21 204246

I was in a good position in the tournament; I didn't want to play for a big pot with this hand.

Especially not against Abarone, who is a strong regular.

Few cards are blocked, so it is not suitable for bluffing either.


Having thought through these questions, it is quite clear that throwing would have been the right game. With GTO, I always reassure myself to call it that, but it's a much more complex game theory that I don't have enough knowledge for.

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • 1776798568909.png
    1776798568909.png
    58.4 KB · Views: 3
G

Geo90

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Total posts
439
HU
Poker Chips
429
Casino Coins
0
  • #17
monkeytilter said:
Key here is "realising equity"(y)
Love all the "this is an auto call pre" in the thread, yes GTO indicates it's a defend but GTO will play it perfectly post flop (with bluffs most wouldn't even dream of) and even then probably only eke out less than 0.5bb profit from the spot - look at the pickle you got into hitting one of the best hands you can make!

On the river, this is an under-bluffed spot IMHO.
Villain is risking his tourney life for a pot he has not invested that much in and you have bet into on the river.

We need villain to be bluffing about 1/3 of the time on the river given the price we are getting - I'd want a read on villain to be making this call (is he capable of big bluffs or making polarisation errors etc.)

I like your river bet (population tend to check back too much) if you have the discipline to bet-fold to the shove.




Yeah, that’s exactly the mistake I always make too. Just

like you said, instead of 1BB, I lost 32BB with a weak hand against a strong

regular. I’d need such a deep understanding of GTO game theory to understand

why he’s doing what he’s doing street by street, which I don’t have,



On the river, 12234/41640, 29% pot odds, so I really couldn’t fold here,
 
G

Geo90

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Total posts
439
HU
Poker Chips
429
Casino Coins
0
  • #18
Poker Orifice said:
Villain is definitely capable of big bluffs. It's Aaron 'fk_n' Barone ... LFG!!!
I sometimes watch his streams; he’s a really good player—he plays an incredible number of tournaments in a single session
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poker Orifice
G

Geo90

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Total posts
439
HU
Poker Chips
429
Casino Coins
0
  • #19
Sunz of Beaches said:
Yeah but as u said he plays many many tables and this is a spot where he faces a decent bet on the river while his opponent has a lot of flushes in his range. Would be very very surprised if he just goes "nuts" here on a pure bluff. Most likely has a higher flush shoving there.

Played against him once on wpt and in one hour he played like zero hands. Not that this matters too much and not that i have a real idea about his game now after watching only 1 hour of his play but i think its probably a misconception to think those crushers are bluffing all the time, especially in spots like this, while playing a gazillion tables.

Is he capable? Yes sure
Is this a spot he would do it or where its a good idea to do it in general? Imo no. Too risky to get ur opponent off a low flush that he has certainly in his range. And im sure he knows that.
Yes, that's exactly what happened—as you wrote, He had a higher flush.


It wasn't the best situation for bluffing; I might have a straight, a lot of sets, or a flush.
 
G

Geo90

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Total posts
439
HU
Poker Chips
429
Casino Coins
0
  • #20
fundiver199 said:
I dont think, its a big mistake to just fold preflop, especially when another guy has already called. Its protects you from making costly mistakes against a tight UTG range and - pontentially - a tough opponent, which you would rather avoid. But the rest of the hand is just a cooler. If he bet the turn, there is no way, you can fold a flushdraw +gutshot + pair, and then there is only a single bet left for the river. And obviously you are not going to check-fold the river, when you just made your flush. You are either going to jam for value or check-call, and either way get the bad news, that your opponent has the nuts.
Yes, several people mentioned above that I need to think more carefully about how a 95S hand performs against the UTG range, and there was also a BU call here.


I shouldn't follow the GTO so closely; I need to play tighter from the BB to avoid these difficult situations.


Thanks for the analysis.
 
Top