B
bbiase
Rock Star
Silver Level
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2015
- Total posts
- 178
- Awards
- 1
- Poker Chips
- 0
- Casino Coins
- 0
- #26
My goodness...
You don't bet with aces to scare away speculative hands. You bet with aces to get VALUE from speculative hands. Aces ARE going to get cracked from time to time, and in the meantime, you should try to extract value from those hands, betting to make worse hands call.
UNIVERSAL RULE OF POKER - THERE'S THREE REASONS TO BET - ONLY THREE
1) To make worse hands call (VALUE BET)
2) To make better hands fold (bluff)
3) To deny equity of hands with potential to improve (PROTECTION)
Aces pre flop is the nuts. There's no better hands. It's the ultimate value holding pre flop. You SHOULD be betting to make worse hands call.
So pre-flop:
1) Limping is a bad option, since you're not getting the value you want from worse hands;
2) Min raising is a bad option, since you're not getting enough value from worse hands, UNLESS it's your standard raising strategy;
3) Overbetting/overraising is a bad option, since you're turning your hand faceup and telling: "hey everybody, I have aces, let me take the blinds and antes pls"
Best pre-flop strategy for aces is to follow your standard strategy pre flop raise sizings.
And YES, it's very difficult to get three streets of value with unimproved aces post flop unless you're playing a total fish willing to go to rivers with top pair or worse hands. Even those top pair type of hands are much more likely to improve by the river than aces.
I just don't see any news in the assumption: "You should always play cautiously with just one pair post flop".
You don't bet with aces to scare away speculative hands. You bet with aces to get VALUE from speculative hands. Aces ARE going to get cracked from time to time, and in the meantime, you should try to extract value from those hands, betting to make worse hands call.
UNIVERSAL RULE OF POKER - THERE'S THREE REASONS TO BET - ONLY THREE
1) To make worse hands call (VALUE BET)
2) To make better hands fold (bluff)
3) To deny equity of hands with potential to improve (PROTECTION)
Aces pre flop is the nuts. There's no better hands. It's the ultimate value holding pre flop. You SHOULD be betting to make worse hands call.
So pre-flop:
1) Limping is a bad option, since you're not getting the value you want from worse hands;
2) Min raising is a bad option, since you're not getting enough value from worse hands, UNLESS it's your standard raising strategy;
3) Overbetting/overraising is a bad option, since you're turning your hand faceup and telling: "hey everybody, I have aces, let me take the blinds and antes pls"
Best pre-flop strategy for aces is to follow your standard strategy pre flop raise sizings.
And YES, it's very difficult to get three streets of value with unimproved aces post flop unless you're playing a total fish willing to go to rivers with top pair or worse hands. Even those top pair type of hands are much more likely to improve by the river than aces.
I just don't see any news in the assumption: "You should always play cautiously with just one pair post flop".
Last edited:

















