Which poker platform is easiest to be profitable?

[member401988]

Replay Poker.

They only have play money.

Some try to play "seriously" but many players are either bad or just messing around.

But can you call it profitable when you don't earn real money?

he probably doesn't play Replay poker, but he thought it was for real money


even real poker has already turned me on - why bother with children's games

 

[pentazepam]

he probably doesn't play Replay poker, but he thought it was for real money


even real poker has already turned me on - why bother with children's games

If you want to play anything else than NLH or PLO there is almost only Play Money left.

Do you only play for money? Are you a professional poker player?

 

[member401988]

If you want to play anything else than NLH or PLO there is almost only Play Money left.

Do you only play for money? Are you a professional poker player?

I am the best poker player in the world - only a few can compete with me-everyone should respect themselves and others as well

 

[Poker Orifice]

The one thing I dislike about WPT, and I haven't played a NLH Cash game on there in a while because of this.
The feature where the other players can pay to see your cards, after you've won the hand before showdown. I find that gives away a lot of info, and it only costs them pennies (at low stakes).

Is this feature still there? It turned me off from WPT and I haven't returned.

Yes it is
There's a ton of stuff that is really lacking on the WPT site imo. But the one thing it has going for it, the players are loose, wild, BAD & LOVE to Gamble... along with weak, calling stations and obviously very new to the game. A good % of them play worse than the sites back in 2007 - 2009 days. Too bad there's so many things that suck on the site otherwise I think I'd be playing there all the time.

 

[ErnieMustang]

Yes it is
There's a ton of stuff that is really lacking on the WPT site imo. But the one thing it has going for it, the players are loose, wild, BAD & LOVE to Gamble... along with weak, calling stations and obviously very new to the game. A good % of them play worse than the sites back in 2007 - 2009 days. Too bad there's so many things that suck on the site otherwise I think I'd be playing there all the time.

That's too bad. I'd love to spend more time playing there, but that particular feature was kind of a deal breaker for me as far as the cash tables go.
I still play the odd MTT on there.

 

[Poker Orifice]

That's too bad. I'd love to spend more time playing there, but that particular feature was kind of a deal breaker for me as far as the cash tables go.
I still play the odd MTT on there.

What part of Canada are you from? (I'm in West Kootenays B.C.)

 

[mssmotilda]

At micro limits the game is the same everywhere.

 

[ErnieMustang]

What part of Canada are you from? (I'm in West Kootenays B.C.)

I've been in Saskatchewan all my life!
I visit BC now and then, beautiful province. Much rather be there than here lol.

 

[ramdon p358]

All poker rooms have their difficulties, I can say that it would be easier to win money in those rooms that offer free tournaments and where you don't have to risk your money

 

[Newzooozooo]

Hi
888 is the most profitable for me. I play in the freerolls that are available on this site, in our CardsChat freerolls, and others whenever possible. In addition to freerolls, I also play in tournaments with buy-ins up to $5.5.

 

[Poker Orifice]

At micro limits the game is the same everywhere.

For what format? Tournaments? Cash games?

 

[Cooking]

The one thing I dislike about WPT, and I haven't played a NLH Cash game on there in a while because of this.
The feature where the other players can pay to see your cards, after you've won the hand before showdown. I find that gives away a lot of info, and it only costs them pennies (at low stakes).

Is this feature still there? It turned me off from WPT and I haven't returned.

I also don't play there for a few months because I just can't deal with their slow software, but the last time I've played that option was still available.

 

[Poker Orifice]

I also don't play there for a few months because I just can't deal with their slow software, but the last time I've played that option was still available.

It is the same for me. Now that the KingsOfCash promotion is over, I won't be on there much at all. Typically I only play on there for the 100 hands & I do so very late at night when the other sites don't have much traffic for the tables I play on. I also dread playing the KingsOfCash freeroll on Sundays because even though it's EASY MONEY in that game, it robs my CPU and makes it very difficult to play on other sites. Many times I've heard WPT admin./support say the software will be getting better soon but I haven't seen it yet and it's been a year since they said it (the small changes they've made on their updates are frankly quite useless imo)

 

[Rost]

For the last year, I've been playing poker at only three sites: 888, PokerStars and Replay. I rarely play at PokerStars, mostly 90% of all the tournaments I take part in are held at 888 and Replay. I'm annoyed by Replay, as I think this site is made absolutely negligently. I like 888 the best of the three.

 

[john_entony]

Replay Poker! Definitely! And only thanks to CardsChat, of course. I think in second place is PokerStars. They are offering some very juicy satellites right now. For example, yesterday I saw a satellite for a 40-player maximum, and there were 10 seats in the prize zone (the prize was a $109 buy-in ticket).

 

[La reytor]

Playing at WPT can be profitable as it attracts a lot of recreational and beginner players due to its popularity. This leads to tables with a lower level of competition compared to other rooms, which can increase your chances of winning if you are experienced.

 

[pavel1111111]

I am playing at Pokerstars for over 14 years and I am very satisfy with their offers 😁🤙

 

[Zotreccy]

I’ve had a solid experience playing low-stakes MTTs on KOITOTO lately. The fields aren’t packed with grinders, and the structure gives enough room to play without crazy variance. It feels like a nice middle ground if you're trying to build a bankroll slowly. I’ve also found some soft sit-and-go tables there where people really overvalue top pair, so it’s been easier to spot good spots to push edges.

 

[Sherlock77]

intertops & juicy stakes cash games are kind of soft.

lot of crazy players.

 

[flabilim]

GI really like wpt and 888

 

[Stringy]

888, lots of freerolls tournaments and fish

 

[Denzzo]

I feel like Party Poker has worked out well for me

 

[fewerz]

888 and PokerStars are the best personally for me.
Testing GG now.

 

[wushibala]

I don’t remember if it was Maradona or Pelé who once said: ‘If you can’t score in these goals, you won’t score even if they make them bigger by the length of a ball.’ He said that when a journalist asked if the goals should be made larger. I think it’s the same with your question — if you can’t win on 888, you probably won’t do it on other platforms either. It’s simple: you either can or you can’t.