Are Cash Game Players Better Than Tournament Players?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flamenkit154
  • Start date Start date
flamenkit154

flamenkit154

Enthusiast
Silver Level
DZ
Poker Chips
346
Casino Coins
0
Hi everyone,
I've often heard cash game players say that tournaments are mostly about surviving variance, while tournament players argue that MTTs require a wider range of skills, including ICM, short-stack play, and adapting to constantly changing stack sizes.
In your opinion, which format produces the stronger overall poker players?
 
Both are complex, and it's surprising how much the same game can change with two different variants. But, in my opinion, tournament players need to learn and consider many more aspects than cash game players.
 
flamenkit154 said:
Hi everyone,
I've often heard cash game players say that tournaments are mostly about surviving variance, while tournament players argue that MTTs require a wider range of skills, including ICM, short-stack play, and adapting to constantly changing stack sizes.
In your opinion, which format produces the stronger overall poker players?
Click to expand...
There are strong players in every field. But comparing a strong cash game player and a strong tournament player is not very correct because in reality these are completely different fields of poker.
 
flamenkit154 said:
Hi everyone,
I've often heard cash game players say that tournaments are mostly about surviving variance, while tournament players argue that MTTs require a wider range of skills, including ICM, short-stack play, and adapting to constantly changing stack sizes.
In your opinion, which format produces the stronger overall poker players?
Click to expand...
MTT start creates the stronger overall players as 100bb MTT strat is the same as cash. However, many players start playing cash so there are very few MTT players who were MTT only early then succeeded and moved to cash. Strong players going the other way are more common.

🤔🤓
 
Cash game players are stronger imo

Deep stack play is more.complex than short stack play, fewer fish and less variance to mask ability, if you are crushing online high stakes you will be a very strong poker player. When the top cash game players move to mtts they tend to crush their as well.

Of course mtts require different study points like icm, different stack depths etc
 
Reply
  • Like
Reactions: fundiver199 and Sunz of Beaches
Lots of people move successfully from high level Cash Game to high level Tournament play. Not very many manage the reverse successfully.
 
Cash game and tournament players have different strengths. Cash game players often excel at deep-stack fundamentals and postflop play, while tournament players are skilled at adapting to changing stack sizes, ICM pressure, and short-stack situations. Neither group is inherently better the stronger player is usually the one with more experience and study in their chosen format.
 
Cash game and tournament play need different skill sets.
So this makes the player types not directly compareable in the form of which players are better poker players in my opinion.
Cash game players skills are deep stacked strategy, patience and more mathemtical play; Tournament players need more adaptility, ICM mechanics with different stack sizes and so on.
 
Everyone is good in their own way, but I think a tournament player can also be strong in cash games — you just need to switch gears and adjust your style. Since the blinds don’t constantly increase in cash games, pushing you into risky spots, you can afford to wait longer and simply play your cards. But for a cash game player, it’s harder to adapt to tournaments because the blinds keep going up, and you really need broader poker knowledge there.
 
flamenkit154 said:
Hi everyone,
I've often heard cash game players say that tournaments are mostly about surviving variance, while tournament players argue that MTTs require a wider range of skills, including ICM, short-stack play, and adapting to constantly changing stack sizes.
In your opinion, which format produces the stronger overall poker players?
Click to expand...
"I think both formats develop different strengths. Cash game specialists often have stronger fundamentals because they're constantly playing deep-stacked, making precise decisions, and facing the same opponents for long periods. Tournament players, on the other hand, need to master a wider variety of situations—ICM pressure, short-stack strategy, changing stack depths, and final-table dynamics.
If we're talking about pure technical fundamentals, I'd probably lean toward top cash game players. But if we're talking about versatility and adapting to different situations, elite MTT players have a strong case. The strongest overall poker players are usually the ones who can succeed in both formats, because they've developed skills from each." ♠️🔥
 
that’s a great breakdown, and I completely agree. It really comes down to deep-stack technical mastery versus extreme situational adaptability. The truly elite players are definitely the ones who can bridge that gap and crush both formats
 
I don't think there's a clear winner. Cash games usually require stronger deep-stack fundamentals, while tournaments test a wider range of skills like ICM, short-stack play, and adjusting to changing stack sizes.

If someone can consistently beat both formats, that's probably the strongest overall poker player in my opinion.
 
I don't know if cash game players are necessarily better, but I think cash games are probably more profitable in the long run.
You have more control over table selection, session length, and when to exit. Tournaments can have huge prizes, but the variance is much greater.
 
I prefer freerolls and microstakes MTTs. I like the changing stack sizes and the thrill of going on a deep run, where your final placement decides whether you win or bust before the money.
 
Back
Top